[SAC] OSGeo3 Bios Update Tomorrow (6/3)

Alex Mandel tech_dev at wildintellect.com
Fri Jun 3 14:16:33 EDT 2011


I agree, osgeo4 should stay on - the majority of project sites are on
osgeo4 and much of their use does not require login.

Should we send an email out on OSGeo-Discuss saying that login services
will be down along with trac/svn, and the wiki for ~30 minutes today?

Thanks,
Alex

On 06/03/2011 05:04 AM, christopher.schmidt at nokia.com wrote:
> Please don't do that. The majority of osgeo services do not require authentication. If we're concerned about confused state, we can restart after the update, but broken authentication is better than unavailable services.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ext Martin Spott
> Sent:  06/03/2011, 7:47  AM
> To: System Administration Committee Discussion/OSGeo
> Subject: Re: [SAC] OSGeo3 Bios Update Tomorrow (6/3)
> 
> On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 02:56:50PM -0700, Alex Mandel wrote:
> 
>> Please let me know if there are any objections to this scheduling.
>> Downtime should be ~30 minutes.
> 
> I'd propose to stop _all_ OSGeo VM's, those on'osgeo4' as well, while
> the update is in progress so user's don't run into authentication
> errors while the LDAP directoy is down.
> 
> Cheers,
>         Martin.
> --
>  Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Sac mailing list
> Sac at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/sac
> _______________________________________________
> Sac mailing list
> Sac at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/sac



More information about the Sac mailing list