<html xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#954F72;
text-decoration:underline;}
pre
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"HTML con formato previo Car";
margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Courier New";}
span.HTMLconformatoprevioCar
{mso-style-name:"HTML con formato previo Car";
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"HTML con formato previo";
font-family:"Courier New";}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;}
@page WordSection1
{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
margin:70.85pt 3.0cm 70.85pt 3.0cm;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style></head><body lang=ES link=blue vlink="#954F72"><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><pre><span style='color:black'>Dear community,<o:p></o:p></span></pre><pre><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></pre><pre><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></pre><pre><span style='color:black'>I have updated mi wiki page with the weekly report 2. Any comments and suggestions on the issues raised in the report are welcome.<o:p></o:p></span></pre><pre><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></pre><pre><b><span style='color:black'>What did I complete this week?<o:p></o:p></span></b></pre><pre><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></pre><pre><span style='color:black'>This week, I have developed the rule <b><i>must be disjoint</i></b> for two datasets and I have also taken tolerance into account. In addition, I have developed a script with the action to apply in case that rule is violated. To make a first test of the code I have created two datasets of points that can be found in the _test_ folder. The rule detects that there are non-disjoint points (errors) in different datasets and allows you to apply the delete point action.<o:p></o:p></span></pre><pre><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></pre><pre><span style='color:black'>On the other hand, a new repository was added for the development of a new rule, later, related to the duplication of points in a dataset.<o:p></o:p></span></pre><pre><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></pre><pre><i><span style='color:black'>updated wiki:</span></i><span style='color:black'> <a href="https://github.com/hecnita/gvsig-gsoc2019-topology/wiki/Rule-Must-be-disjoint">https://github.com/hecnita/gvsig-gsoc2019-topology/wiki/Rule-Must-be-disjoint</a><o:p></o:p></span></pre><pre><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></pre><pre><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></pre><pre><i><span style='color:black'>rule repository:</span></i><span style='color:black'> <a href="https://github.com/hecnita/TopologyRuleMustBeDisjointPoint">https://github.com/hecnita/TopologyRuleMustBeDisjointPoint</a><o:p></o:p></span></pre><pre><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></pre><pre><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></pre><pre><b><span style='color:black'>What am I going to achieve for next week?<o:p></o:p></span></b></pre><pre><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></pre><pre><span style='color:black'>Next week the plan established in the timeline related to the testing, debugging, optimization and documentation of the rule and actions will not be followed. The main reason is that during the week we had doubts about whether this rule should be applied only to a dataset to avoid duplicate points or develop another rule that collected this functionality in the <b><i>TopologyRuleMustNotHaveDuplicatesPoint</i></b> repository. Therefore, during the next few days this rule will be paused and all these issues will be matured until the most appropriate scope of application is defined. In the meantime, I'll start developing the next rule in the list <b><i>Must Not Have Dangles</i></b>.<o:p></o:p></span></pre><pre><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></pre><pre><b><span style='color:black'>Is there any blocking issue?<o:p></o:p></span></b></pre><pre><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></pre><pre><span style='color:black'>Apart from the doubts mentioned in the previous section related to the scope of application, there is no type of practical blockage when developing the code. Also, I have fluid contact with my main tutor.<o:p></o:p></span></pre><pre><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></pre><pre><span style='color:black'>Weekly report 2 link: <a href="https://github.com/hecnita/gvsig-gsoc2019-topology/wiki/Weekly-Report-2">https://github.com/hecnita/gvsig-gsoc2019-topology/wiki/Weekly-Report-2</a> <o:p></o:p></span></pre><pre><span style='color:black'> <o:p></o:p></span></pre><pre><span style='color:black'>Regards<o:p></o:p></span></pre><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div></body></html>