<p dir="ltr">This may be a repeat for some of you - for others not on the osgeo discuss list this might be new. Worth a read regardless if you are interested in data formats. </p>
<p dir="ltr">You might need to start reading at the bottom. <br><br></p>
<p dir="ltr">---------------------------- <br>
Sent from my Mobile Device<br>
</p>
<div class="gmail_quote">---------- Forwarded message ----------<br>From: "Suchith Anand" <<a href="mailto:Suchith.Anand@nottingham.ac.uk">Suchith.Anand@nottingham.ac.uk</a>><br>Date: Apr 27, 2015 7:29 AM<br>Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [TC-Discuss] Open Letter for the need for Open Standards in LiDAR<br>To: "Keith Ryden" <<a href="mailto:kryden@esri.com">kryden@esri.com</a>>, "<a href="mailto:tc-discuss@lists.opengeospatial.org">tc-discuss@lists.opengeospatial.org</a>" <<a href="mailto:tc-discuss@lists.opengeospatial.org">tc-discuss@lists.opengeospatial.org</a>>, "<a href="mailto:ica-osgeo-labs@lists.osgeo.org">ica-osgeo-labs@lists.osgeo.org</a>" <<a href="mailto:ica-osgeo-labs@lists.osgeo.org">ica-osgeo-labs@lists.osgeo.org</a>>, "<a href="mailto:discuss@lists.osgeo.org">discuss@lists.osgeo.org</a>" <<a href="mailto:discuss@lists.osgeo.org">discuss@lists.osgeo.org</a>><br>Cc: <br><br type="attribution">Thank you Keith for your response on behalf of Esri to our draft Open Letter [1] on the need for Open Standards in LiDAR. Unfortunately this response fails to provide a commitment by Esri to address the key concerns raised in the Open Letter. Cameron Shorter has provided a line-by-line refuting of Esri's statement in his blog post titled "Esri's claim at being good 'Standards' citizens is questionable" [2]. I will suggest you respond to these specific concerns.<br>
<br>
You will notice the Open Letter is presented by the Open Source Geospatial Foundation, and is signed by over 100 prominent people from the geospatial industry. Many of their comments highlight how deeply the community cares about usability of data and the importance of open standards.<br>
<br>
We request Esri act in the spirit of Keith's letter, which describes the importance of open standards. And we look forward to seeing how Esri proposes to reverse the current Lidar format fragmentation that is unfolding. Please include actions and timeframes.<br>
<br>
Best wishes,<br>
<br>
Suchith Anand<br>
Founder, GeoForAll<br>
<a href="http://www.geoforall.org" target="_blank">http://www.geoforall.org</a><br>
<br>
[1] <a href="http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/LIDAR_Format_Letter" target="_blank">http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/LIDAR_Format_Letter</a><br>
[2] <a href="http://cameronshorter.blogspot.co.uk/2015/04/esris-claim-at-being-good-standards.html" target="_blank">http://cameronshorter.blogspot.co.uk/2015/04/esris-claim-at-being-good-standards.html</a><br>
<br>
<br>
________________________________________<br>
From: TC-Discuss [<a href="mailto:tc-discuss-bounces@lists.opengeospatial.org">tc-discuss-bounces@lists.opengeospatial.org</a>] On Behalf Of Keith Ryden [<a href="mailto:kryden@esri.com">kryden@esri.com</a>]<br>
Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2015 7:54 PM<br>
To: <a href="mailto:tc-discuss@lists.opengeospatial.org">tc-discuss@lists.opengeospatial.org</a><br>
Subject: Re: [TC-Discuss] Open Letter for the need for Open Standards in LiDAR<br>
<br>
Regarding Dr. Anand’s concerns and the referenced letter below:<br>
<br>
Esri has long understood the importance of interoperability between systems and users of geographic information and services. Esri has participated in the development of national, information community, OGC, and ISO TC 211 standards from the development of the US Spatial Data Transfer Standard in the 1980s through the development of OGC Geopackage today. As a sustaining member of ASPRS and a Principle member of OGC, Esri would gladly participate in efforts to further the development of open LIDAR and point cloud standards. Keep in mind that ASPRS owns and maintains LAS, along with other spatial information standards, and would have the lead in moving it into OGC or ISO TC211 for further work if they so desired. Esri will continue to support and use the ASPRS LAS standard; the Optimized LAS (see FAQ at <a href="https://github.com/Esri/esri-zlas-io-library" target="_blank">https://github.com/Esri/esri-zlas-io-library</a>) is not intended to replace LAS but to enhance access to remotely stored LIDAR information for our users.<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
<br>
Keith Ryden<br>
ESRI Software Development<br>
<br>
From: TC-Discuss [mailto:<a href="mailto:tc-discuss-bounces%2Bkryden">tc-discuss-bounces+kryden</a>=<a href="mailto:esri.com@lists.opengeospatial.org">esri.com@lists.opengeospatial.org</a>] On Behalf Of Suchith Anand<br>
Sent: Monday, April 13, 2015 10:30 AM<br>
To: <a href="mailto:discuss@lists.osgeo.org">discuss@lists.osgeo.org</a>; <a href="mailto:ica-osgeo-labs@lists.osgeo.org">ica-osgeo-labs@lists.osgeo.org</a>; <a href="mailto:tc-discuss@lists.opengeospatial.org">tc-discuss@lists.opengeospatial.org</a><br>
Subject: [TC-Discuss] Open Letter for the need for Open Standards in LiDAR<br>
<br>
To all colleagues in Academia, Government and Industry who have interest in maintaining Open Standards:<br>
<br>
<br>
On behalf of "Geo for All" community, <a href="http://www.geoforall.org" target="_blank">http://www.geoforall.org</a>, I would like to bring to your kind attention a significant development that can lead to undermining our principle for Open Geospatial Standards. I request you review the wikipage <a href="http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/LIDAR_Format_Letter" target="_blank">http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/LIDAR_Format_Letter</a> that is meant to represent our concern and allow for ongoing input and expression by our geospatial community.<br>
<br>
We specifically thank Martin Isenburg (author of LASzip and LAStools, <a href="http://laszip.org" target="_blank">http://laszip.org</a> and <a href="http://lastools.org" target="_blank">http://lastools.org</a>) for bringing this matter to our attention (email below) and an email thread of our initial discussion of this subject that highlight the wider implication of this issue <a href="http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/ica-osgeo-labs/2015-March/001225.html" target="_blank">http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/ica-osgeo-labs/2015-March/001225.html</a><br>
We request all who wish to support this effort to protect Open Standards for Geospatial data to kindly add your name , email, affiliation details to the wikipage directly or email Patrick Hogan (Email - <a href="mailto:patrick.hogan@nasa.gov">patrick.hogan@nasa.gov</a> ) with the subject heading "Support for Open Geo Standards" and the following fields (Name, Email, Affiliation ) and we will gladly add this to the wiki.<br>
<br>
There is current interest by the OGC in pursuing point cloud encoding standards, including a member-initiated mechanism to extend LAS data with OGC-standard XML content. The OGC invites interested members who wish to work on this effort to please contact Scott Simmons (Executive Director, Standards Program E-mail : <a href="mailto:ssimmons@opengeospatial.org">ssimmons@opengeospatial.org</a> ) to register their interest and discuss details. OGC will also be holding an ad hoc session at our next Technical Committee meeting in Boulder, CO, USA in June 1st (more details will be send soon) to bring together all interested from all sectors (government, industry, academia) for this and plan next steps. We welcome feedback and input from Esri and invite them to join this effort to support open LIDAR formats.<br>
<br>
I thank you all again for your attention and support for this important matter.<br>
<br>
Best wishes,<br>
<br>
Suchith Anand<br>
Founder, GeoForAll<br>
<a href="http://www.geoforall.org" target="_blank">http://www.geoforall.org</a><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
-------- Forwarded Message --------<br>
Subject:<br>
<br>
Please review: Open Letter asking to avoid format fragmentation in LiDAR standards<br>
<br>
Date:<br>
<br>
Sat, 11 Apr 2015 12:14:51 +1000<br>
<br>
From:<br>
<br>
Cameron Shorter <<a href="mailto:cameron.shorter@gmail.com">cameron.shorter@gmail.com</a>><mailto:<a href="mailto:cameron.shorter@gmail.com">cameron.shorter@gmail.com</a>><br>
<br>
To:<br>
<br>
<a href="mailto:standards@lists.osgeo.org">standards@lists.osgeo.org</a><mailto:<a href="mailto:standards@lists.osgeo.org">standards@lists.osgeo.org</a>> <<a href="mailto:standards@lists.osgeo.org">standards@lists.osgeo.org</a>><mailto:<a href="mailto:standards@lists.osgeo.org">standards@lists.osgeo.org</a>><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Hi all,<br>
A number of us have been collaboratively developing an Open Letter asking key stakeholders to avoid fragmentation in LiDAR standards.<br>
<br>
It starts:<br>
We, the undersigned, are concerned that the current interoperability between LiDAR applications, through use of the open "LAS" format, is being threatened by ESRI's introduction and promotion of an alternative "Optimized LAS" proprietary format. This is of concern since the fragmentation of the LAS format will lead to reduced interoperability between applications and organisations, and introduce vendor lock-in.<br>
<br>
Could all interested please:<br>
1. Review and provide feedback to this standards email list<br>
2. If you agree with the letter, please add your name to the "Signed" section<br>
<br>
--<br>
<br>
Cameron Shorter,<br>
<br>
Software and Data Solutions Manager<br>
<br>
LISAsoft<br>
<br>
Suite 112, Jones Bay Wharf,<br>
<br>
26 - 32 Pirrama Rd, Pyrmont NSW 2009<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
P +61 2 9009 5000, W <a href="http://www.lisasoft.com" target="_blank">www.lisasoft.com</a>, F <a href="tel:%2B61%202%209009%205099" value="+61290095099">+61 2 9009 5099</a><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee<br>
and may contain confidential information. If you have received this<br>
message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it.<br>
<br>
Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this<br>
message or in any attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by the<br>
author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the<br>
University of Nottingham.<br>
<br>
This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an<br>
attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage your<br>
computer system, you are advised to perform your own checks. Email<br>
communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as<br>
permitted by UK legislation.<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Discuss mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Discuss@lists.osgeo.org">Discuss@lists.osgeo.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss" target="_blank">http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss</a><br>
</div>