[OSGeo-Standards] OWS-5 Agile Geography - KML 3 (more open than most)

[Lorenzo Becchi]

> Honestly I'm surprised when I see questions like this.  To me it
> seems more likely that KML will eat the low end applications of GML,
> stifling it's adoption but I don't see how KML replaces WMS and WFS.

Honesty, it make sense to be surprised.
I've wrote a bull$&£?!
sorry

evidently this shows my level of actual confusion after a good and 
relaxing holiday.

AS far as I've intended SLD, WMC and GML,  :-)  ,will be involved in the 
adoption of KML.

so we should parse those questions with this substitution:
WMS/WFS/SLD/WMC -> SLD/WMC/GML
then things should stay together.

ciao
Lorenzo



Frank Warmerdam wrote:
> Lorenzo Becchi wrote:
>> - how long will WMS/WFS/SLD/WMC survive before KML will be adopted by 
>> main FOSS implementations (es: GeoServer/OpenLayers) ?
>> - does it make sense to think that adopting the future KML will be 
>> the natural end of WMS/SLD/WMC/WFS?
>
> Lorenzo,
>
> Honestly I'm surprised when I see questions like this.  To me it
> seems more likely that KML will eat the low end applications of GML,
> stifling it's adoption but I don't see how KML replaces WMS and WFS.
>
> Perhaps I fail to grok how KML will solve all the webs problems with one
> simple feature format that includes a few representation features.
>
> Best regards,