<font size=2 face="sans-serif">Is there any time frame proposed for the
adoption of this draft spec?</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Doug Newman.<br>
</font>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<table width=100%>
<tr valign=top>
<td><font size=1 color=#5f5f5f face="sans-serif">From:</font>
<td><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Volker Mische <volker.mische@gmail.com></font>
<tr valign=top>
<td><font size=1 color=#5f5f5f face="sans-serif">To:</font>
<td><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Douglas J Newman <Doug.Newman-NR@raytheon.com></font>
<tr>
<td valign=top><font size=1 color=#5f5f5f face="sans-serif">Cc:</font>
<td><font size=1 face="sans-serif">standards@lists.osgeo.org, "Hua,
Hook" <hook.hua@jpl.nasa.gov>, christopher.s.lynnes@nasa.gov,
Matthew Cechini <Matthew.F.Cechini@nasa.gov></font>
<tr valign=top>
<td><font size=1 color=#5f5f5f face="sans-serif">Date:</font>
<td><font size=1 face="sans-serif">01/26/2011 10:25 AM</font>
<tr valign=top>
<td><font size=1 color=#5f5f5f face="sans-serif">Subject:</font>
<td><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Re: [OSGeo-Standards] Proposal for Open
Search Geo extension support of point and line</font></table>
<br>
<hr noshade>
<br>
<br>
<br><tt><font size=2>On 26.01.2011 15:31, Douglas J Newman wrote:<br>
><br>
> The NASA ECHO project (_www.echo.nasa.gov_ <</font></tt><a href=http://www.echo.nasa.gov/><tt><font size=2>http://www.echo.nasa.gov/</font></tt></a><tt><font size=2>>)<br>
> is in the process of<br>
> providing a search capability, via an ESIP interface (using the Open<br>
> Search standard with Geo extension), by point and line.<br>
><br>
> The current implementation can be seen at<br>
> _https://api.echo.nasa.gov/echo-esip/_<br>
><br>
> The _http://www.georss.org/simple_specification (which I believe the<br>
> geo<br>
> extension is based on) provides this support and we would like to<br>
> propose<br>
> it's addition to the open search geo spec.<br>
><br>
> For example,<br>
><br>
> Example URL templates:<br>
> _<br>
> __http://example.com/?q={searchTerms}&pw={startPage?}&line={geo:line?}&format=rss_<br>
> <</font></tt><a href="http://example.com/?q=%7BsearchTerms%7D&pw=%7BstartPage?%7D&line=%7Bgeo:line?%7D&format=rss"><tt><font size=2>http://example.com/?q=%7BsearchTerms%7D&pw=%7BstartPage?%7D&line=%7Bgeo:line?%7D&format=rss</font></tt></a><tt><font size=2>><br>
> _<br>
> __http://example.com/?q={searchTerms}&pw={startPage?}&point={geo:point?}&format=rss_<br>
> <</font></tt><a href="http://example.com/?q=%7BsearchTerms%7D&pw=%7BstartPage?%7D&point=%7Bgeo:point?%7D&format=rss"><tt><font size=2>http://example.com/?q=%7BsearchTerms%7D&pw=%7BstartPage?%7D&point=%7Bgeo:point?%7D&format=rss</font></tt></a><tt><font size=2>><br>
><br>
> Example requests:<br>
> _<br>
> __http://example.com/?q=pizza&line=-111.032,42.943,-119.856,43.039&format=rss_<br>
> <</font></tt><a href="http://example.com/?q=pizza&line=-111.032,42.943,-119.856,43.039&format=rss"><tt><font size=2>http://example.com/?q=pizza&line=-111.032,42.943,-119.856,43.039&format=rss</font></tt></a><tt><font size=2>><br>
> _<br>
> __http://example.com/?q=pizza&point=-111.032,42.943,-&format=rss_<br>
> <</font></tt><a href="http://example.com/?q=pizza&point=-111.032,42.943,-&format=rss"><tt><font size=2>http://example.com/?q=pizza&point=-111.032,42.943,-&format=rss</font></tt></a><tt><font size=2>><br>
><br>
> I note that the section of the Geo extension on atom responses has
the<br>
> element,<br>
><br>
> <georss:line>40.73763 -73.9972 40.73519 -73.99167 40.737015
-73.99035<br>
> 40.73643 -73.98914 40.734640 -73.990431 40.731617 -73.991504</<br>
> georss:line><br>
><br>
> we propose an additional element for point,<br>
><br>
> <georss:point>40.73763 -73.9972</georss:point><br>
><br>
> Please let us know if this is proposal is acceptable.<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> Standards mailing list<br>
> Standards@lists.osgeo.org<br>
> </font></tt><a href=http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/standards><tt><font size=2>http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/standards</font></tt></a><tt><font size=2><br>
<br>
<br>
Hi Douglas,<br>
<br>
there is the OpenSearch Geo Draft 2 which might not be linked yet. Have
<br>
a look at the geoemtry parameter:<br>
</font></tt><a href=http://www.opensearch.org/Specifications/OpenSearch/Extensions/Geo/1.0/Draft_2#The_.22geometry.22_parameter><tt><font size=2>http://www.opensearch.org/Specifications/OpenSearch/Extensions/Geo/1.0/Draft_2#The_.22geometry.22_parameter</font></tt></a><tt><font size=2><br>
<br>
I think it does exactly what you are looking for.<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
Volker<br>
</font></tt>
<br>
<br>