<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Hi Jody,<br>
I forgot to answer your comments here. Sorry.<br>
<br>
On 30/10/13 17:14, Jody Garnett wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:etPan.5270a3dc.1f16e9e8.25a7@Liberi.local"
type="cite">
<div id="bloop_customfont"
style="font-family:Helvetica,Arial;font-size:13px; color:
rgba(0,0,0,1.0); margin: 0px; line-height: auto;">Nice break
down. Not sure what you mean by a demo page, but projects such
as GeoServer and deegree run the CITE tests.</div>
<div id="bloop_customfont"
style="font-family:Helvetica,Arial;font-size:13px; color:
rgba(0,0,0,1.0); margin: 0px; line-height: auto;"><br>
</div>
<div id="bloop_customfont"
style="font-family:Helvetica,Arial;font-size:13px; color:
rgba(0,0,0,1.0); margin: 0px; line-height: auto;">Two bits of
feedback, and two diagrams to back them up.</div>
<div id="bloop_customfont"
style="font-family:Helvetica,Arial;font-size:13px; color:
rgba(0,0,0,1.0); margin: 0px; line-height: auto;"><br>
</div>
<div id="bloop_customfont"
style="font-family:Helvetica,Arial;font-size:13px; color:
rgba(0,0,0,1.0); margin: 0px; line-height: auto;">1) Want to
only reward testing here, not implementing. <br>
</div>
</blockquote>
OSGeo-Live already documents "implementing" of OGC standards, and I
don't think we should remove that. I think there is value to users
to know when a project claims to read layers from a WMS, even if it
hasn't passed CITE tests.<br>
<br>
And we should be reference the standard, not specific projects.
Apart from other reasons, trying to track the web of
projects/versions which have been tested to work with each other
becomes a logistics challange I wouldn't want to tackle.<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>