From bob.basques at CI.STPAUL.MN.US  Fri Mar  3 15:52:51 2006
From: bob.basques at CI.STPAUL.MN.US (Bob Basques)
Date: Sun Feb 10 21:19:52 2008
Subject: GISmo Update.
Message-ID: <FRI.3.MAR.2006.145251.0600.TCMUGLISTS.UMN.EDU>

It's almost there.

All,

We're working diligently to get it out there.  Actaully, the technical
piece is already done.  We're waiting on Management's OK at this point,
won't happen for a another week or so though.

Most everything else is ready to go from the technical aspects of
putting a DEMO with Data out as a TARball download.  There's even a
nifty installer script.

Wait it out with us, we'll get it to you all.

bobb

From trex0003 at UMN.EDU  Sat Mar  4 19:45:57 2006
From: trex0003 at UMN.EDU (Dale Trexel)
Date: Sun Feb 10 21:19:52 2008
Subject: MNDNR DOQ WMS?
Message-ID: <SAT.4.MAR.2006.184557.0600.TCMUGLISTS.UMN.EDU>

Anyone out there use MN DNR's DOQ WMS service in one of their MapServer
applications? I had it working on a class project I developed over a
year ago, but it appears things have changed, and I can no longer get
things to work. I think I happened to stumble on the correct
configuration the first time, but now that things have changed, I'm not
so lucky in troubleshooting. Even a copy of a working layer definition
from a mapfile might be enough to get me started.

Here's the original layer definition I used:

LAYER
     NAME 'doq'
     TYPE RASTER
     STATUS OFF
     CONNECTION
"HTTP://maps.dnr.state.mn.us/cgi-bin/mapserv43?map=DELI_WMS_MAPFILE&amp;"
     CONNECTIONTYPE WMS
     MAXSCALE 100000
     METADATA
       "wms_srs" "EPSG:26915"
       "wms_name" "L370000050906"
       "wms_server_version" "1.1.1"
       "wms_formatlist" "image/gif, image/png, image/jpeg, image/wbmp"
       "wms_format" "image/gif"
       "wms_connectiontimeout" "30"
       #"wms_maxscale" "50"
       #"wms_latlonboundingbox" "183000 4.8024e+06 771000 5.4855e+06"
     END
   END

My map had been working with this layer definition, including the
commented out metadata parameters at the end. The DNR's data deli
provides a WMS GetCapabilities file here:

   http://deli.dnr.state.mn.us/services.html

...which suggests that the first thing I need to change is CONNECTION to

   http://deli.dnr.state.mn.us/cgi-bin/wms?map=DELI_WMS_MAPFILE&

And here's the bit about DOQs in the XML file:

<Layer queryable="0" opaque="0" cascaded="0" noSubsets="0">
   <Name>L370000050906</Name>
   <Title>USGS Digital Orthophoto Quad (DOQ) - 3 meter</Title>
   <SRS>EPSG:26915</SRS>
   <LatLonBoundingBox minx="-97.3732" miny="43.3076" maxx="-89.2598"
maxy="49.5221" />
   <BoundingBox SRS="EPSG:26915" minx="183000" miny="4.8024e+06"
maxx="771000" maxy="5.4855e+06" />
   <ScaleHint min="0" max="49.8903" />
   </Layer>

I tried changing the CONNECTION, leaving the rest the same, since it
didn't appear anything else has changed, but no good. I keep getting the
following error message:

"msDrawMap(): WMS connection error. Failed to draw WMS layer named
'doq'. This most likely happened because the remote WMS server returned
an invalid image, and XML exception or another unexpected result in
response to the GetMap request. Also check and make sure that the
layer's connection URL is valid."

Can anyone tell me what is wrong from this information? Also, is there a
way of troubleshooting WMS errors so that I can get more details than
the above error message?

-Dale Trexel

From bfischer at HOUSTONENGINEERINGINC.COM  Sat Mar  4 19:50:58 2006
From: bfischer at HOUSTONENGINEERINGINC.COM (Fischer, Brian)
Date: Sun Feb 10 21:19:52 2008
Subject: MNDNR DOQ WMS?
Message-ID: <SAT.4.MAR.2006.185058.0600.TCMUGLISTS.UMN.EDU>

Hi Dale,
 
The MnDNR setup the service at the Data Deli.  (Check out http://deli.dnr.state.mn.us/services.html).  Here's what I use.  This is both the 2003 FSA and DOQ 3m photos.
 
#  LAYER
#    NAME L390003782306
#    METADATA
#   "wms_title" "Farm Services Administration (FSA) Color Orthophotos"
#   "wms_server_version" "1.1.1"
#   "wms_srs" "EPSG:26915"
#   "wms_format" "image/jpeg"
#    END
#    TYPE RASTER
#    STATUS OFF
#    MAXSCALE 50000
#    MINSCALE 500
#    CONNECTIONTYPE WMS
#    CONNECTION "http://deli.dnr.state.mn.us/cgi-bin/wms?map=DELI_WMS_MAPFILE&VERSION=1.1.1&REQUEST=GetMap&layers=L390003782306&Transparent=false&exceptions=inimage&format=jpeg"
#    PROJECTION
#        "init=EPSG:26915"
#     END
#   End #layer WMS 2003 FSA photos
  #LAYER
  #  NAME MnDNRDOQ3m
  #  METADATA
  # "wms_title" "USGS Digital Orthophoto Quad (DOQ) - 3 meter"
  # "wms_server_version" "1.1.1"
  # "wms_srs" "EPSG:26915"
  # "wms_format" "image/jpeg"
  #  END
  #  TYPE RASTER
  #  STATUS OFF
  #  MAXSCALE 75000
  #  MINSCALE 500
  #  CONNECTIONTYPE WMS
  #  CONNECTION "http://deli.dnr.state.mn.us/cgi-bin/wms?map=DELI_WMS_MAPFILE&VERSION=1.1.1&REQUEST=GetMap&layers=L370000050906&Transparent=false&exceptions=inimage&format=jpeg"
  #  PROJECTION
  #      "init=EPSG:26915"
  #   END
  # End #layer WMS MnDNR Doqs
 
Brian

________________________________

From: Twin Cities MapServer Users Group on behalf of Dale Trexel
Sent: Sat 3/4/2006 6:45 PM
To: TCMUG@LISTS.UMN.EDU
Subject: MNDNR DOQ WMS?



Anyone out there use MN DNR's DOQ WMS service in one of their MapServer
applications? I had it working on a class project I developed over a
year ago, but it appears things have changed, and I can no longer get
things to work. I think I happened to stumble on the correct
configuration the first time, but now that things have changed, I'm not
so lucky in troubleshooting. Even a copy of a working layer definition
from a mapfile might be enough to get me started.

Here's the original layer definition I used:

LAYER
     NAME 'doq'
     TYPE RASTER
     STATUS OFF
     CONNECTION
"HTTP://maps.dnr.state.mn.us/cgi-bin/mapserv43?map=DELI_WMS_MAPFILE&"
     CONNECTIONTYPE WMS
     MAXSCALE 100000
     METADATA
       "wms_srs" "EPSG:26915"
       "wms_name" "L370000050906"
       "wms_server_version" "1.1.1"
       "wms_formatlist" "image/gif, image/png, image/jpeg, image/wbmp"
       "wms_format" "image/gif"
       "wms_connectiontimeout" "30"
       #"wms_maxscale" "50"
       #"wms_latlonboundingbox" "183000 4.8024e+06 771000 5.4855e+06"
     END
   END

My map had been working with this layer definition, including the
commented out metadata parameters at the end. The DNR's data deli
provides a WMS GetCapabilities file here:

   http://deli.dnr.state.mn.us/services.html

...which suggests that the first thing I need to change is CONNECTION to

   http://deli.dnr.state.mn.us/cgi-bin/wms?map=DELI_WMS_MAPFILE&

And here's the bit about DOQs in the XML file:

<Layer queryable="0" opaque="0" cascaded="0" noSubsets="0">
   <Name>L370000050906</Name>
   <Title>USGS Digital Orthophoto Quad (DOQ) - 3 meter</Title>
   <SRS>EPSG:26915</SRS>
   <LatLonBoundingBox minx="-97.3732" miny="43.3076" maxx="-89.2598"
maxy="49.5221" />
   <BoundingBox SRS="EPSG:26915" minx="183000" miny="4.8024e+06"
maxx="771000" maxy="5.4855e+06" />
   <ScaleHint min="0" max="49.8903" />
   </Layer>

I tried changing the CONNECTION, leaving the rest the same, since it
didn't appear anything else has changed, but no good. I keep getting the
following error message:

"msDrawMap(): WMS connection error. Failed to draw WMS layer named
'doq'. This most likely happened because the remote WMS server returned
an invalid image, and XML exception or another unexpected result in
response to the GetMap request. Also check and make sure that the
layer's connection URL is valid."

Can anyone tell me what is wrong from this information? Also, is there a
way of troubleshooting WMS errors so that I can get more details than
the above error message?

-Dale Trexel

From trex0003 at UMN.EDU  Sun Mar  5 12:10:54 2006
From: trex0003 at UMN.EDU (Dale Trexel)
Date: Sun Feb 10 21:19:52 2008
Subject: MNDNR DOQ WMS?
In-Reply-To: <E46EB727C630074680B446D7F02D454801F18857@fs02.houstonengineeringinc.com>
Message-ID: <SUN.5.MAR.2006.111054.0600.TCMUGLISTS.UMN.EDU>

Thanks, Brian!

Actually, it turns out my problem was a MapServer configuration issue
after all. (I thought I'd ruled that out.) But your example was able to
show me that WMS layer definitions in mapfiles appear to be rather
robust to variation.

Also, your example made me aware that the FSA photos were now available
via WMS. That's great! I especially thank you for that.

-Dale


Fischer, Brian wrote:
> > Hi Dale,
> >
> > The MnDNR setup the service at the Data Deli.  (Check out http://deli.dnr.state.mn.us/services.html).  Here's what I use.  This is both the 2003 FSA and DOQ 3m photos.
> >
> > #  LAYER
> > #    NAME L390003782306
> > #    METADATA
> > #   "wms_title" "Farm Services Administration (FSA) Color Orthophotos"
> > #   "wms_server_version" "1.1.1"
> > #   "wms_srs" "EPSG:26915"
> > #   "wms_format" "image/jpeg"
> > #    END
> > #    TYPE RASTER
> > #    STATUS OFF
> > #    MAXSCALE 50000
> > #    MINSCALE 500
> > #    CONNECTIONTYPE WMS
> > #    CONNECTION "http://deli.dnr.state.mn.us/cgi-bin/wms?map=DELI_WMS_MAPFILE&VERSION=1.1.1&REQUEST=GetMap&layers=L390003782306&Transparent=false&exceptions=inimage&format=jpeg"
> > #    PROJECTION
> > #        "init=EPSG:26915"
> > #     END
> > #   End #layer WMS 2003 FSA photos
> >   #LAYER
> >   #  NAME MnDNRDOQ3m
> >   #  METADATA
> >   # "wms_title" "USGS Digital Orthophoto Quad (DOQ) - 3 meter"
> >   # "wms_server_version" "1.1.1"
> >   # "wms_srs" "EPSG:26915"
> >   # "wms_format" "image/jpeg"
> >   #  END
> >   #  TYPE RASTER
> >   #  STATUS OFF
> >   #  MAXSCALE 75000
> >   #  MINSCALE 500
> >   #  CONNECTIONTYPE WMS
> >   #  CONNECTION "http://deli.dnr.state.mn.us/cgi-bin/wms?map=DELI_WMS_MAPFILE&VERSION=1.1.1&REQUEST=GetMap&layers=L370000050906&Transparent=false&exceptions=inimage&format=jpeg"
> >   #  PROJECTION
> >   #      "init=EPSG:26915"
> >   #   END
> >   # End #layer WMS MnDNR Doqs
> >
> > Brian
> >

From naci0002 at UMN.EDU  Tue Mar  7 19:08:44 2006
From: naci0002 at UMN.EDU (Pericles S. Nacionales)
Date: Sun Feb 10 21:19:52 2008
Subject: March meeting?
Message-ID: <TUE.7.MAR.2006.180844.0600.TCMUGLISTS.UMN.EDU>

It just occurred to me that the third week of March is fast approaching (in
two weeks) and that we should think about a topic and a meeting place.

Does Tuesday, the 21st, work with any of you?  What about a topic?  Do we need
a meeting room or would a pub suffice?  If pub is OK, my vote goes to Barley
John's again.  I heard they serve Surly beers now.  :) 

-Perry

From bob.basques at CI.STPAUL.MN.US  Tue Mar  7 19:20:10 2006
From: bob.basques at CI.STPAUL.MN.US (Bob Basques)
Date: Sun Feb 10 21:19:52 2008
Subject: March meeting?
In-Reply-To: <200603071808.44462.naci0002@umn.edu>
Message-ID: <TUE.7.MAR.2006.182010.0600.TCMUGLISTS.UMN.EDU>

Pericles S. Nacionales wrote:
> > It just occurred to me that the third week of March is fast approaching (in
> > two weeks) and that we should think about a topic and a meeting place.
> >
> > Does Tuesday, the 21st, work with any of you?  What about a topic?  Do we need
> > a meeting room or would a pub suffice?  If pub is OK, my vote goes to Barley
> > John's again.  I heard they serve Surly beers now.  :) 
> >
> > -Perry
> >
> >
All,

I was going to suggest an agenda item about GISmo, aka "Moose", but it's
not looking like we'll be pushing anything out the door before the 23rd
of the month.  So I guess that will have to wait for the next meeting.

:c)

bobb

From naci0002 at UMN.EDU  Tue Mar  7 19:29:56 2006
From: naci0002 at UMN.EDU (Pericles S. Nacionales)
Date: Sun Feb 10 21:19:52 2008
Subject: March meeting?
In-Reply-To: <440E233A.3090407@ci.stpaul.mn.us>
Message-ID: <TUE.7.MAR.2006.182956.0600.TCMUGLISTS.UMN.EDU>

Or we can move the date to accommodate the Moose! I have a couple logo ideas
that we can discuss at the meeting.  :) 

-Perry

On Tuesday 07 March 2006 18:20, Bob Basques wrote:
> > Pericles S. Nacionales wrote:
>> > > It just occurred to me that the third week of March is fast approaching
>> > > (in two weeks) and that we should think about a topic and a meeting
>> > > place.
>> > >
>> > > Does Tuesday, the 21st, work with any of you?  What about a topic?  Do we
>> > > need a meeting room or would a pub suffice?  If pub is OK, my vote goes
>> > > to Barley John's again.  I heard they serve Surly beers now.  :) 
>> > >
>> > > -Perry
> >
> > All,
> >
> > I was going to suggest an agenda item about GISmo, aka "Moose", but it's
> > not looking like we'll be pushing anything out the door before the 23rd
> > of the month.  So I guess that will have to wait for the next meeting.
> >
> > :c)
> >
> > bobb

From osgis.lists at GMAIL.COM  Wed Mar  8 09:27:58 2006
From: osgis.lists at GMAIL.COM (David Bitner)
Date: Sun Feb 10 21:19:52 2008
Subject: March meeting?
In-Reply-To: <200603071829.56315.naci0002@umn.edu>
Message-ID: <WED.8.MAR.2006.082758.0600.TCMUGLISTS.UMN.EDU>

Tuesday the 21st sounds good to me.

One of these days, I'd like to go through my geocoder code with the
group both as a tutorial and to get some ideas to clean it up to make
it easier for others to use.  Hopefully this would be a meeting that
Jeff Coate who just started using it would be able to show up to too.

I could definitely handle an evening at Barley Johns.

David

On 3/7/06, Pericles S. Nacionales <naci0002@umn.edu> wrote:
> > Or we can move the date to accommodate the Moose! I have a couple logo ideas
> > that we can discuss at the meeting.  :) 
> >
> > -Perry
> >
> > On Tuesday 07 March 2006 18:20, Bob Basques wrote:
>> > > Pericles S. Nacionales wrote:
>>> > > > It just occurred to me that the third week of March is fast approaching
>>> > > > (in two weeks) and that we should think about a topic and a meeting
>>> > > > place.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Does Tuesday, the 21st, work with any of you?  What about a topic?  Do we
>>> > > > need a meeting room or would a pub suffice?  If pub is OK, my vote goes
>>> > > > to Barley John's again.  I heard they serve Surly beers now.  :) 
>>> > > >
>>> > > > -Perry
>> > >
>> > > All,
>> > >
>> > > I was going to suggest an agenda item about GISmo, aka "Moose", but it's
>> > > not looking like we'll be pushing anything out the door before the 23rd
>> > > of the month.  So I guess that will have to wait for the next meeting.
>> > >
>> > > :c)
>> > >
>> > > bobb
> >

From David.Fawcett at STATE.MN.US  Wed Mar  8 10:15:59 2006
From: David.Fawcett at STATE.MN.US (Fawcett, David)
Date: Sun Feb 10 21:19:52 2008
Subject: March meeting?
Message-ID: <WED.8.MAR.2006.091559.0600.TCMUGLISTS.UMN.EDU>

The 21st would probably work for me too.  

-----Original Message-----
From: Twin Cities MapServer Users Group [mailto:TCMUG@lists.umn.edu] On
Behalf Of David Bitner
Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 8:28 AM
To: TCMUG@lists.umn.edu
Subject: Re: March meeting?


Tuesday the 21st sounds good to me.

One of these days, I'd like to go through my geocoder code with the
group both as a tutorial and to get some ideas to clean it up to make it
easier for others to use.  Hopefully this would be a meeting that Jeff
Coate who just started using it would be able to show up to too.

I could definitely handle an evening at Barley Johns.

David

On 3/7/06, Pericles S. Nacionales <naci0002@umn.edu> wrote:
> > Or we can move the date to accommodate the Moose! I have a couple logo

> > ideas that we can discuss at the meeting.  :) 
> >
> > -Perry
> >
> > On Tuesday 07 March 2006 18:20, Bob Basques wrote:
>> > > Pericles S. Nacionales wrote:
>>> > > > It just occurred to me that the third week of March is fast 
>>> > > > approaching (in two weeks) and that we should think about a topic 
>>> > > > and a meeting place.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Does Tuesday, the 21st, work with any of you?  What about a topic?

>>> > > > Do we need a meeting room or would a pub suffice?  If pub is OK, 
>>> > > > my vote goes to Barley John's again.  I heard they serve Surly 
>>> > > > beers now.  :) 
>>> > > >
>>> > > > -Perry
>> > >
>> > > All,
>> > >
>> > > I was going to suggest an agenda item about GISmo, aka "Moose", but 
>> > > it's not looking like we'll be pushing anything out the door before 
>> > > the 23rd of the month.  So I guess that will have to wait for the 
>> > > next meeting.
>> > >
>> > > :c)
>> > >
>> > > bobb
> >

From bfischer at HOUSTONENGINEERINGINC.COM  Wed Mar  8 11:20:22 2006
From: bfischer at HOUSTONENGINEERINGINC.COM (Fischer, Brian)
Date: Sun Feb 10 21:19:52 2008
Subject: March meeting?
Message-ID: <WED.8.MAR.2006.102022.0600.TCMUGLISTS.UMN.EDU>

That date should work for me as well.

Brian Fischer
Houston Engineering, Inc.
Maple Grove, MN
(763) 493-4522
-----Original Message-----
From: Twin Cities MapServer Users Group [mailto:TCMUG@LISTS.UMN.EDU] On
Behalf Of Fawcett, David
Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 9:16 AM
To: TCMUG@LISTS.UMN.EDU
Subject: Re: March meeting?

The 21st would probably work for me too.  

-----Original Message-----
From: Twin Cities MapServer Users Group [mailto:TCMUG@lists.umn.edu] On
Behalf Of David Bitner
Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 8:28 AM
To: TCMUG@lists.umn.edu
Subject: Re: March meeting?


Tuesday the 21st sounds good to me.

One of these days, I'd like to go through my geocoder code with the
group both as a tutorial and to get some ideas to clean it up to make it
easier for others to use.  Hopefully this would be a meeting that Jeff
Coate who just started using it would be able to show up to too.

I could definitely handle an evening at Barley Johns.

David

On 3/7/06, Pericles S. Nacionales <naci0002@umn.edu> wrote:
> > Or we can move the date to accommodate the Moose! I have a couple logo

> > ideas that we can discuss at the meeting.  :) 
> >
> > -Perry
> >
> > On Tuesday 07 March 2006 18:20, Bob Basques wrote:
>> > > Pericles S. Nacionales wrote:
>>> > > > It just occurred to me that the third week of March is fast 
>>> > > > approaching (in two weeks) and that we should think about a topic 
>>> > > > and a meeting place.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Does Tuesday, the 21st, work with any of you?  What about a topic?

>>> > > > Do we need a meeting room or would a pub suffice?  If pub is OK, 
>>> > > > my vote goes to Barley John's again.  I heard they serve Surly 
>>> > > > beers now.  :) 
>>> > > >
>>> > > > -Perry
>> > >
>> > > All,
>> > >
>> > > I was going to suggest an agenda item about GISmo, aka "Moose", but 
>> > > it's not looking like we'll be pushing anything out the door before 
>> > > the 23rd of the month.  So I guess that will have to wait for the 
>> > > next meeting.
>> > >
>> > > :c)
>> > >
>> > > bobb
> >

From trex0003 at UMN.EDU  Wed Mar  8 11:23:17 2006
From: trex0003 at UMN.EDU (Dale Trexel)
Date: Sun Feb 10 21:19:52 2008
Subject: March meeting?
In-Reply-To: <E46EB727C630074680B446D7F02D454803FAE61D@fs02.houstonengineeringinc.com>
Message-ID: <WED.8.MAR.2006.102317.0600.TCMUGLISTS.UMN.EDU>

I should be able to make it too.

-Dale


Fischer, Brian wrote:
> > That date should work for me as well.
> >
> > Brian Fischer
> > Houston Engineering, Inc.
> > Maple Grove, MN
> > (763) 493-4522
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Twin Cities MapServer Users Group [mailto:TCMUG@LISTS.UMN.EDU] On
> > Behalf Of Fawcett, David
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 9:16 AM
> > To: TCMUG@LISTS.UMN.EDU
> > Subject: Re: March meeting?
> >
> > The 21st would probably work for me too.
> >

From bob.basques at CI.STPAUL.MN.US  Wed Mar  8 11:56:17 2006
From: bob.basques at CI.STPAUL.MN.US (Bob Basques)
Date: Sun Feb 10 21:19:52 2008
Subject: March meeting?
In-Reply-To: <200603071829.56315.naci0002@umn.edu>
Message-ID: <WED.8.MAR.2006.105617.0600.TCMUGLISTS.UMN.EDU>

I knew the logo processing was going to be a major topic  :c)

bobb


Pericles S. Nacionales wrote:
> > Or we can move the date to accommodate the Moose! I have a couple logo ideas
> > that we can discuss at the meeting.  :) 
> >
> > -Perry
> >
> > On Tuesday 07 March 2006 18:20, Bob Basques wrote:
> >
>> >> Pericles S. Nacionales wrote:
>> >>
>>> >>> It just occurred to me that the third week of March is fast approaching
>>> >>> (in two weeks) and that we should think about a topic and a meeting
>>> >>> place.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Does Tuesday, the 21st, work with any of you?  What about a topic?  Do we
>>> >>> need a meeting room or would a pub suffice?  If pub is OK, my vote goes
>>> >>> to Barley John's again.  I heard they serve Surly beers now.  :) 
>>> >>>
>>> >>> -Perry
>>> >>>
>> >> All,
>> >>
>> >> I was going to suggest an agenda item about GISmo, aka "Moose", but it's
>> >> not looking like we'll be pushing anything out the door before the 23rd
>> >> of the month.  So I guess that will have to wait for the next meeting.
>> >>
>> >> :c)
>> >>
>> >> bobb
>> >>
> >
> >

From Brian_Huberty at FWS.GOV  Wed Mar  8 12:02:13 2006
From: Brian_Huberty at FWS.GOV (Brian Huberty)
Date: Sun Feb 10 21:19:52 2008
Subject: March meeting?
In-Reply-To: <440F0CB1.5040307@ci.stpaul.mn.us>
Message-ID: <WED.8.MAR.2006.110213.0600.TCMUGLISTS.UMN.EDU>

Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: C5467785.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 18536 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/tcmug/attachments/20060308/617b949b/C5467785.gif
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: graycol.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 105 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/tcmug/attachments/20060308/617b949b/graycol.gif
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: pic26500.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 1255 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/tcmug/attachments/20060308/617b949b/pic26500.gif
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ecblank.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 45 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/tcmug/attachments/20060308/617b949b/ecblank.gif
From sdlime at COMCAST.NET  Wed Mar  8 19:57:29 2006
From: sdlime at COMCAST.NET (Stephen Lime)
Date: Sun Feb 10 21:19:52 2008
Subject: March meeting?
In-Reply-To: <6246727221874A4FB8D3F9BBC37D9BD55D080E@s-sp22.pca.state.mn.us>
Message-ID: <WED.8.MAR.2006.185729.0600.TCMUGLISTS.UMN.EDU>

Works for me.

On Mar 8, 2006, at 9:15 AM, Fawcett, David wrote:

> > The 21st would probably work for me too.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Twin Cities MapServer Users Group [mailto:TCMUG@lists.umn.edu] On
> > Behalf Of David Bitner
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 8:28 AM
> > To: TCMUG@lists.umn.edu
> > Subject: Re: March meeting?
> >
> >
> > Tuesday the 21st sounds good to me.
> >
> > One of these days, I'd like to go through my geocoder code with the
> > group both as a tutorial and to get some ideas to clean it up to make
> > it
> > easier for others to use.  Hopefully this would be a meeting that Jeff
> > Coate who just started using it would be able to show up to too.
> >
> > I could definitely handle an evening at Barley Johns.
> >
> > David
> >
> > On 3/7/06, Pericles S. Nacionales <naci0002@umn.edu> wrote:
>> >> Or we can move the date to accommodate the Moose! I have a couple logo
> >
>> >> ideas that we can discuss at the meeting.  :) 
>> >>
>> >> -Perry
>> >>
>> >> On Tuesday 07 March 2006 18:20, Bob Basques wrote:
>>> >>> Pericles S. Nacionales wrote:
>>>> >>>> It just occurred to me that the third week of March is fast
>>>> >>>> approaching (in two weeks) and that we should think about a topic
>>>> >>>> and a meeting place.
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> Does Tuesday, the 21st, work with any of you?  What about a topic?
> >
>>>> >>>> Do we need a meeting room or would a pub suffice?  If pub is OK,
>>>> >>>> my vote goes to Barley John's again.  I heard they serve Surly
>>>> >>>> beers now.  :) 
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> -Perry
>>> >>>
>>> >>> All,
>>> >>>
>>> >>> I was going to suggest an agenda item about GISmo, aka "Moose", but
>>> >>> it's not looking like we'll be pushing anything out the door before
>>> >>> the 23rd of the month.  So I guess that will have to wait for the
>>> >>> next meeting.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> :c)
>>> >>>
>>> >>> bobb
>> >>
> >

From naci0002 at UMN.EDU  Sun Mar 12 02:01:51 2006
From: naci0002 at UMN.EDU (Pericles S. Nacionales)
Date: Sun Feb 10 21:19:52 2008
Subject: March meeting?
In-Reply-To: <c17136d6e9f17d9065f1976284ab626a@comcast.net>
Message-ID: <SUN.12.MAR.2006.010151.0600.TCMUGLISTS.UMN.EDU>

So, the 21st it is.  17:00? 17:30?

Dave B. would you be able to go through your geocoder code in this meeting?
At Barley John's?  :) 

-Perry

On Wednesday 08 March 2006 18:57, Stephen Lime wrote:
> > Works for me.
> >
> > On Mar 8, 2006, at 9:15 AM, Fawcett, David wrote:
>> > > The 21st would probably work for me too.
>> > >
>> > > -----Original Message-----
>> > > From: Twin Cities MapServer Users Group [mailto:TCMUG@lists.umn.edu] On
>> > > Behalf Of David Bitner
>> > > Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 8:28 AM
>> > > To: TCMUG@lists.umn.edu
>> > > Subject: Re: March meeting?
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Tuesday the 21st sounds good to me.
>> > >
>> > > One of these days, I'd like to go through my geocoder code with the
>> > > group both as a tutorial and to get some ideas to clean it up to make
>> > > it
>> > > easier for others to use.  Hopefully this would be a meeting that Jeff
>> > > Coate who just started using it would be able to show up to too.
>> > >
>> > > I could definitely handle an evening at Barley Johns.
>> > >
>> > > David
>> > >
>> > > On 3/7/06, Pericles S. Nacionales <naci0002@umn.edu> wrote:
>>> > >> Or we can move the date to accommodate the Moose! I have a couple logo
>>> > >>
>>> > >> ideas that we can discuss at the meeting.  :) 
>>> > >>
>>> > >> -Perry
>>> > >>
>>> > >> On Tuesday 07 March 2006 18:20, Bob Basques wrote:
>>>> > >>> Pericles S. Nacionales wrote:
>>>>> > >>>> It just occurred to me that the third week of March is fast
>>>>> > >>>> approaching (in two weeks) and that we should think about a topic
>>>>> > >>>> and a meeting place.
>>>>> > >>>>
>>>>> > >>>> Does Tuesday, the 21st, work with any of you?  What about a topic?
>>>>> > >>>>
>>>>> > >>>> Do we need a meeting room or would a pub suffice?  If pub is OK,
>>>>> > >>>> my vote goes to Barley John's again.  I heard they serve Surly
>>>>> > >>>> beers now.  :) 
>>>>> > >>>>
>>>>> > >>>> -Perry
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>> All,
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>> I was going to suggest an agenda item about GISmo, aka "Moose", but
>>>> > >>> it's not looking like we'll be pushing anything out the door before
>>>> > >>> the 23rd of the month.  So I guess that will have to wait for the
>>>> > >>> next meeting.
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>> :c)
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>> bobb

--
Pericles S. Nacionales
Conservation Biology Program
University of Minnesota
e-mail: naci0002@umn.edu

From osgis.lists at GMAIL.COM  Mon Mar 13 09:50:39 2006
From: osgis.lists at GMAIL.COM (David Bitner)
Date: Sun Feb 10 21:19:52 2008
Subject: March meeting?
In-Reply-To: <200603120101.52119.naci0002@umn.edu>
Message-ID: <MON.13.MAR.2006.085039.0600.TCMUGLISTS.UMN.EDU>

I would need to go through the geocoder here.  Let's just get some
good beer this month.

If folks are interested, I'll plan on hosting at the MAC next month.

On 3/12/06, Pericles S. Nacionales <naci0002@umn.edu> wrote:
> > So, the 21st it is.  17:00? 17:30?
> >
> > Dave B. would you be able to go through your geocoder code in this meeting?
> > At Barley John's?  :) 
> >
> > -Perry
> >
> > On Wednesday 08 March 2006 18:57, Stephen Lime wrote:
>> > > Works for me.
>> > >
>> > > On Mar 8, 2006, at 9:15 AM, Fawcett, David wrote:
>>> > > > The 21st would probably work for me too.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > -----Original Message-----
>>> > > > From: Twin Cities MapServer Users Group [mailto:TCMUG@lists.umn.edu] On
>>> > > > Behalf Of David Bitner
>>> > > > Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 8:28 AM
>>> > > > To: TCMUG@lists.umn.edu
>>> > > > Subject: Re: March meeting?
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Tuesday the 21st sounds good to me.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > One of these days, I'd like to go through my geocoder code with the
>>> > > > group both as a tutorial and to get some ideas to clean it up to make
>>> > > > it
>>> > > > easier for others to use.  Hopefully this would be a meeting that Jeff
>>> > > > Coate who just started using it would be able to show up to too.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > I could definitely handle an evening at Barley Johns.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > David
>>> > > >
>>> > > > On 3/7/06, Pericles S. Nacionales <naci0002@umn.edu> wrote:
>>>> > > >> Or we can move the date to accommodate the Moose! I have a couple logo
>>>> > > >>
>>>> > > >> ideas that we can discuss at the meeting.  :) 
>>>> > > >>
>>>> > > >> -Perry
>>>> > > >>
>>>> > > >> On Tuesday 07 March 2006 18:20, Bob Basques wrote:
>>>>> > > >>> Pericles S. Nacionales wrote:
>>>>>> > > >>>> It just occurred to me that the third week of March is fast
>>>>>> > > >>>> approaching (in two weeks) and that we should think about a topic
>>>>>> > > >>>> and a meeting place.
>>>>>> > > >>>>
>>>>>> > > >>>> Does Tuesday, the 21st, work with any of you?  What about a topic?
>>>>>> > > >>>>
>>>>>> > > >>>> Do we need a meeting room or would a pub suffice?  If pub is OK,
>>>>>> > > >>>> my vote goes to Barley John's again.  I heard they serve Surly
>>>>>> > > >>>> beers now.  :) 
>>>>>> > > >>>>
>>>>>> > > >>>> -Perry
>>>>> > > >>>
>>>>> > > >>> All,
>>>>> > > >>>
>>>>> > > >>> I was going to suggest an agenda item about GISmo, aka "Moose", but
>>>>> > > >>> it's not looking like we'll be pushing anything out the door before
>>>>> > > >>> the 23rd of the month.  So I guess that will have to wait for the
>>>>> > > >>> next meeting.
>>>>> > > >>>
>>>>> > > >>> :c)
>>>>> > > >>>
>>>>> > > >>> bobb
> >
> > --
> > Pericles S. Nacionales
> > Conservation Biology Program
> > University of Minnesota
> > e-mail: naci0002@umn.edu
> >

From wick0246 at UMN.EDU  Tue Mar 14 11:53:36 2006
From: wick0246 at UMN.EDU (Paul Wickman)
Date: Sun Feb 10 21:19:52 2008
Subject: JOIN ConnectionType?
Message-ID: <TUE.14.MAR.2006.105336.CST.TCMUGLISTS.UMN.EDU>

What connection types (CONNECTIONTYPE) are supported for LAYER JOIN
definitions  I've been successfully joining to DBF files, but would like to
refer in my query results to some extended feature attributes contained in
an ODBC-accessible database (and ultimately a 'regular' non-spatial Oracle
database).  Are the same connection types that are supported for LAYER
definitions also available for JOIN definitions?  The MapServer
documentation for this simply says 'Todo...', and I'm happy to contribute
to the docs once I test things out.

Thanks,
 Paul


---------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
"A computer lets you make more mistakes faster than any invention in human
history... with the possible exception of handguns and tequila."

                                                       - Mitch Ratliff

From naci0002 at UMN.EDU  Mon Mar 20 17:39:11 2006
From: naci0002 at UMN.EDU (Pericles S. Nacionales)
Date: Sun Feb 10 21:19:52 2008
Subject: Reminder: March Meeting
Message-ID: <MON.20.MAR.2006.163911.0600.TCMUGLISTS.UMN.EDU>

Just a friendly reminder that TCMUG is meeting from 5:00 - 7:00pm tomorrow
(Tuesday, the 21st) at Barley John's in New Brighton.  I hope you and your
friends can make it!  :) 

Cheers!
-Perry

From sdlime at COMCAST.NET  Mon Mar 20 23:15:48 2006
From: sdlime at COMCAST.NET (Stephen Lime)
Date: Sun Feb 10 21:19:52 2008
Subject: JOIN ConnectionType?
In-Reply-To: <200603141653.k2EGraQ0022309@badlands.software.umn.edu>
Message-ID: <MON.20.MAR.2006.221548.0600.TCMUGLISTS.UMN.EDU>

Paul: Only 3 connection types are supported: DBF, CSV and MySQL. I don't
think it would necessarily be difficult to add others (the API is very
simple) but
I've not had time. The only one I've used on a regular basis is CSV for
lookup
tables.

Steve

On Mar 14, 2006, at 10:53 AM, Paul Wickman wrote:

> > What connection types (CONNECTIONTYPE) are supported for LAYER JOIN
> > definitions  I've been successfully joining to DBF files, but would
> > like to
> > refer in my query results to some extended feature attributes
> > contained in
> > an ODBC-accessible database (and ultimately a 'regular' non-spatial
> > Oracle
> > database).  Are the same connection types that are supported for LAYER
> > definitions also available for JOIN definitions?  The MapServer
> > documentation for this simply says 'Todo...', and I'm happy to
> > contribute
> > to the docs once I test things out.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >  Paul
> >
> >
> > -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > ----
> > ----
> > "A computer lets you make more mistakes faster than any invention in
> > human
> > history... with the possible exception of handguns and tequila."
> >
> >                                                        - Mitch Ratliff
> >

From David.Fawcett at STATE.MN.US  Tue Mar 21 09:34:23 2006
From: David.Fawcett at STATE.MN.US (Fawcett, David)
Date: Sun Feb 10 21:19:52 2008
Subject: Reminder: March Meeting
Message-ID: <TUE.21.MAR.2006.083423.0600.TCMUGLISTS.UMN.EDU>

Hey Perry, 

Can you send a link to a map for Barley John's?

Thanks, 

David.

-----Original Message-----
From: Twin Cities MapServer Users Group [mailto:TCMUG@lists.umn.edu] On
Behalf Of Pericles S. Nacionales
Sent: Monday, March 20, 2006 4:39 PM
To: TCMUG@lists.umn.edu
Subject: Reminder: March Meeting


Just a friendly reminder that TCMUG is meeting from 5:00 - 7:00pm
tomorrow 
(Tuesday, the 21st) at Barley John's in New Brighton.  I hope you and
your 
friends can make it!  :) 

Cheers!
-Perry

From trex0003 at UMN.EDU  Tue Mar 21 09:38:58 2006
From: trex0003 at UMN.EDU (Dale Trexel)
Date: Sun Feb 10 21:19:52 2008
Subject: Reminder: March Meeting
In-Reply-To: <6246727221874A4FB8D3F9BBC37D9BD55D0862@s-sp22.pca.state.mn.us>
Message-ID: <TUE.21.MAR.2006.083858.0600.TCMUGLISTS.UMN.EDU>

How about this?

     http://www.barleyjohns.com/location.html

Still planning on being there myself.

-Dale



Fawcett, David wrote:
> > Hey Perry,
> >
> > Can you send a link to a map for Barley John's?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > David.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Twin Cities MapServer Users Group [mailto:TCMUG@lists.umn.edu] On
> > Behalf Of Pericles S. Nacionales
> > Sent: Monday, March 20, 2006 4:39 PM
> > To: TCMUG@lists.umn.edu
> > Subject: Reminder: March Meeting
> >
> >
> > Just a friendly reminder that TCMUG is meeting from 5:00 - 7:00pm
> > tomorrow
> > (Tuesday, the 21st) at Barley John's in New Brighton.  I hope you and
> > your
> > friends can make it!  :) 
> >
> > Cheers!
> > -Perry

From naci0002 at UMN.EDU  Tue Mar 21 10:49:51 2006
From: naci0002 at UMN.EDU (Pericles S. Nacionales)
Date: Sun Feb 10 21:19:52 2008
Subject: Reminder: March Meeting
In-Reply-To: <44201002.3040406@umn.edu>
Message-ID: <TUE.21.MAR.2006.094951.0600.TCMUGLISTS.UMN.EDU>

Thanks, Dale!

Here's the Google Map version:
http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&hl=en&sll=45.022066,-93.371686&sspn=0.01817,0.026565&q=Barley+John%27s+Brew+Pub&cid=45022066,-93371686,2591339668345480319&li=lmd&ll=45.037353,-93.198009&spn=0.018165,0.026565

See you there!

-Perry

Dale Trexel wrote:
> > How about this?
> >
> >     http://www.barleyjohns.com/location.html
> >
> > Still planning on being there myself.
> >
> > -Dale
> >
> >
> >
> > Fawcett, David wrote:
>> >> Hey Perry,
>> >> Can you send a link to a map for Barley John's?
>> >>
>> >> Thanks,
>> >> David.
>> >>
>> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> From: Twin Cities MapServer Users Group [mailto:TCMUG@lists.umn.edu] On
>> >> Behalf Of Pericles S. Nacionales
>> >> Sent: Monday, March 20, 2006 4:39 PM
>> >> To: TCMUG@lists.umn.edu
>> >> Subject: Reminder: March Meeting
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Just a friendly reminder that TCMUG is meeting from 5:00 - 7:00pm
>> >> tomorrow (Tuesday, the 21st) at Barley John's in New Brighton.  I hope
>> >> you and
>> >> your friends can make it!  :) 
>> >>
>> >> Cheers!
>> >> -Perry
> >
> > .
> >

From naci0002 at UMN.EDU  Tue Mar 21 11:05:29 2006
From: naci0002 at UMN.EDU (Pericles S. Nacionales)
Date: Sun Feb 10 21:19:52 2008
Subject: Reminder: March Meeting
In-Reply-To: <6246727221874A4FB8D3F9BBC37D9BD55D0862@s-sp22.pca.state.mn.us>
Message-ID: <TUE.21.MAR.2006.100529.0600.TCMUGLISTS.UMN.EDU>

I'll get you better coordinates for Barley John's this evening.  ;)   That
Google point is about 200 meters north of where it really should be...
Datum issues?  :) 

-Perry

Fawcett, David wrote:
> > Hey Perry,
> >
> > Can you send a link to a map for Barley John's?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > David.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Twin Cities MapServer Users Group [mailto:TCMUG@lists.umn.edu] On
> > Behalf Of Pericles S. Nacionales
> > Sent: Monday, March 20, 2006 4:39 PM
> > To: TCMUG@lists.umn.edu
> > Subject: Reminder: March Meeting
> >
> >
> > Just a friendly reminder that TCMUG is meeting from 5:00 - 7:00pm
> > tomorrow
> > (Tuesday, the 21st) at Barley John's in New Brighton.  I hope you and
> > your
> > friends can make it!  :) 
> >
> > Cheers!
> > -Perry
> >
> > .
> >

From bob.basques at CI.STPAUL.MN.US  Mon Mar 27 09:47:33 2006
From: bob.basques at CI.STPAUL.MN.US (Blammo)
Date: Sun Feb 10 21:19:52 2008
Subject: Moose update
Message-ID: <MON.27.MAR.2006.084733.0600.>

All,

The update is, there's no update yet.  :c)

The idea is still rumbling around at the management level.  That's all
for now.

Haven't forgotten about it though.  We're ready to go once we get the go
ahead.

bobb

From osgis.lists at GMAIL.COM  Tue Mar 28 12:52:59 2006
From: osgis.lists at GMAIL.COM (David Bitner)
Date: Sun Feb 10 21:19:52 2008
Subject: April Meeting
Message-ID: <TUE.28.MAR.2006.115259.0600.TCMUGLISTS.UMN.EDU>

Hey Perry,

Have you had a chance to look into getting us a tour of the Surley
Brewery in April?

We should try to get something planned shortly so that we can
advertise it on the general MapServer list (should we cross-list on
any other lists too -- osgeo, postgis?) .

David

From naci0002 at UMN.EDU  Tue Mar 28 13:04:27 2006
From: naci0002 at UMN.EDU (Pericles S. Nacionales)
Date: Sun Feb 10 21:19:52 2008
Subject: April Meeting
In-Reply-To: <71c3c6c50603280952s4b85f6dbi9835543338abd9d8@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <TUE.28.MAR.2006.120427.0600.TCMUGLISTS.UMN.EDU>

No luck, Dave.  Omar is a very busy man these days and the bar isn't quite
ready yet.  I think we should get back to our generally scheduled event...
not beer, but either the Moose or your geocoder.  Or if the whether permits,
picnic!

-Perry

On Tuesday 28 March 2006 11:52, David Bitner wrote:
> > Hey Perry,
> >
> > Have you had a chance to look into getting us a tour of the Surley
> > Brewery in April?
> >
> > We should try to get something planned shortly so that we can
> > advertise it on the general MapServer list (should we cross-list on
> > any other lists too -- osgeo, postgis?) .
> >
> > David

From osgis.lists at GMAIL.COM  Tue Mar 28 13:25:10 2006
From: osgis.lists at GMAIL.COM (David Bitner)
Date: Sun Feb 10 21:19:52 2008
Subject: April Meeting
In-Reply-To: <200603281204.27500.naci0002@umn.edu>
Message-ID: <TUE.28.MAR.2006.122510.0600.TCMUGLISTS.UMN.EDU>

Drats! Thanks for trying Perry.

I'll be on vacation the next two weeks, so going by the third Tuesday,
I think that I'd prefer to hold off on the geocoder until May (unless
we put off the meeting to the 4th Tuesday for April).



On 3/28/06, Pericles S. Nacionales <naci0002@umn.edu> wrote:
> > No luck, Dave.  Omar is a very busy man these days and the bar isn't quite
> > ready yet.  I think we should get back to our generally scheduled event...
> > not beer, but either the Moose or your geocoder.  Or if the whether permits,
> > picnic!
> >
> > -Perry
> >
> > On Tuesday 28 March 2006 11:52, David Bitner wrote:
>> > > Hey Perry,
>> > >
>> > > Have you had a chance to look into getting us a tour of the Surley
>> > > Brewery in April?
>> > >
>> > > We should try to get something planned shortly so that we can
>> > > advertise it on the general MapServer list (should we cross-list on
>> > > any other lists too -- osgeo, postgis?) .
>> > >
>> > > David
> >