<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body>
    <p>Hi,</p>
    <p>No other reactions? I know that procedural topics aren't
      particularly exciting, but we'd probably welcome a bit more
      support from the community (at least the part reading those
      emails) before formally bootstrapping the PSC.</p>
    <p>Best regards,</p>
    <p>Even<br>
    </p>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">Le 27/02/2024 à 16:07, Even Rouault via
      Tiff a écrit :<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
      cite="mid:36e0314c-0b9e-42ba-a7a3-55f7c43e142d@spatialys.com">
      <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
      <div aria-live="assertive" id="magicdomid2" class="ace-line"
        spellcheck="true"><span
          class="author-a-dz79zz80zz74zz72zbkrz83zz89zk3x9bp">Dear
          libtiff community,</span></div>
      <div aria-live="assertive" id="magicdomid3" class="ace-line"
        spellcheck="true"><br>
      </div>
      <div aria-live="assertive" id="magicdomid4" class="ace-line"
        spellcheck="true"><span
          class="author-a-dz79zz80zz74zz72zbkrz83zz89zk3x9bp">The
          libtiff project has run for many years without a formal
          governing body, and while it has worked well for most of the
          time, when difficult non-consensual decisions have to be made,
          it has showed its limits. Recently this was the case for the
          removal in the default build of the retired TIFF command line
          utilities. Hence with a group of other stakeholders including
          me, Su Laus, Bob Friesenhahn, Leonard Rosenthol, Roger Leigh,
          Olivier Paquet and Timothy Lyanguzov, we are proposing to form
          a Project Steering Committee (PSC) for libtiff, with us as the
          initial members of the PSC. That committee would have voting
          powers to make decisions on behalf of the project. This is a
          structure that is heavily used in most of the projects
          affiliated with the Open Source Geospatial Foundation (OSGeo)
          in the geospatial field where I'm involved. A rather
          successful model for the working and scope of such a committee
          is for example the one used by the GDAL (</span><span
          class="author-a-dz79zz80zz74zz72zbkrz83zz89zk3x9bp url"><a
            href="https://gdal.org/development/rfc/rfc1_pmc.html"
            rel="noreferrer noopener" class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
            moz-do-not-send="true">https://gdal.org/development/rfc/rfc1_pmc.html</a></span><span
          class="author-a-dz79zz80zz74zz72zbkrz83zz89zk3x9bp">) and
          MapServer (</span><span
          class="author-a-dz79zz80zz74zz72zbkrz83zz89zk3x9bp url"><a
            href="https://mapserver.org/development/rfc/ms-rfc-23.html"
            rel="noreferrer noopener" class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
            moz-do-not-send="true">https://mapserver.org/development/rfc/ms-rfc-23.html</a></span><span
          class="author-a-dz79zz80zz74zz72zbkrz83zz89zk3x9bp"> )
          projects since 2007</span></div>
      <div aria-live="assertive" id="magicdomid5" class="ace-line"
        spellcheck="true"><br>
      </div>
      <div aria-live="assertive" id="magicdomid6" class="ace-line"
        spellcheck="true"><span
          class="author-a-dz79zz80zz74zz72zbkrz83zz89zk3x9bp">Those
          rules have served well those projects in the last 17 years,
          and  can handle situations where PSC members become inactive
          without formally  resigning (the PSC can of course also decide
          to formally remove members that no longer participate). So we
          are considering taking strong inspiration from them for the
          working of the libtiff PSC . In the adaptations that have been
          discussed between us, the 2 business day minimum delay
          indicated for formal votes is probably too short given libtiff
          usual pace and could be extended to 5. For GDAL and MapServer,
          we also traditionally put adoption of release candidates as
          final approved releases to a PSC vote.  It could be discussed
          if we'd want to do that for libtiff too. For the concrete mode
          of operation, typically in GDAL, when a formal decision has to
          be made, there is a first round of emails "Call for
          discussion: topic XXXX", and once the discussion seems to have
          come to a conclusion there's a "Motion: decision XXXX" where
          PSC members cast their +1, +0, 0, -0, -1 votes. </span></div>
      <div aria-live="assertive" id="magicdomid7" class="ace-line"
        spellcheck="true"><br>
      </div>
      <div aria-live="assertive" id="magicdomid8" class="ace-line"
        spellcheck="true"><span
          class="author-a-dz79zz80zz74zz72zbkrz83zz89zk3x9bp">One
          advantage of the PSC is that difficult decisions are made on
          behalf on the group, which avoids them to be borne by
          individuals. Having a PSC doesn't obviously exclude trying to
          reach consensus among the broader community. Not everything
          needs to be formally discussed and voted. Normal bug-fixing or
          "small" new features can be dealt in merge requests as usual,
          and don't require email traffic. But removing tools or
          functionality, break of backward compatibility, or significant
          addition of new functionality are topics for discussion and
          formal votes. </span></div>
      <div aria-live="assertive" id="magicdomid9" class="ace-line"
        spellcheck="true"><br>
      </div>
      <div aria-live="assertive" id="magicdomid10" class="ace-line"
        spellcheck="true"><span
          class="author-a-dz79zz80zz74zz72zbkrz83zz89zk3x9bp">So, this
          email is to gather feedback from the libtiff community at
          large to check if the idea of a PSC, and its proposed initial
          membership, makes sense. If people would like to be included
          to the initial PSC, they can (possibly privately) reach to us,
          so we can discuss this possibility.</span></div>
      <div aria-live="assertive" id="magicdomid11" class="ace-line"
        spellcheck="true"><br>
      </div>
      <div aria-live="assertive" id="magicdomid12" class="ace-line"
        spellcheck="true"><span
          class="author-a-dz79zz80zz74zz72zbkrz83zz89zk3x9bp">Best
          regards,</span></div>
      <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">-- 
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.spatialys.com"
      moz-do-not-send="true">http://www.spatialys.com</a>
My software is free, but my time generally not.</pre>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="moz-mime-attachment-header"></fieldset>
      <pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">_______________________________________________
Tiff mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Tiff@lists.osgeo.org">Tiff@lists.osgeo.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/tiff">https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/tiff</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
    <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">-- 
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.spatialys.com">http://www.spatialys.com</a>
My software is free, but my time generally not.</pre>
  </body>
</html>