Yves,<br><br>You should have no problems running tilecache and featureserver under mod-python on the same machine... did you run into errors when you tried this yourself? what errors did you get?<br><br>if you have trouble w/wsgi on windows, i'd suggest just sticking w/mod_python. any differences between these in speed that someone else finds on another (probably non win32) machine may not be applicable to your different server (and win32 situation) anyway.<br>
<br clear="all"> -Josh<br>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 9:26 AM, Yves Moisan <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:yves.moisan@boreal-is.com" target="_blank">yves.moisan@boreal-is.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div><br>
> Hi,<br>
><br>
> while trying to move tilecache from mod_python to mod_wsgi, I've run<br>
> into the problem that its config files were not read.<br>
<br>
</div>Hi Soenke,<br>
<br>
I'm not going to answer your question, but rather ask you one (or maybe<br>
two). Do you see a speed difference with mod_wsgi ? I'm currently<br>
thinking of running both TileCache and FeatureServer on the same<br>
instance of mod_python under Apache 2.2 win32 (possible interference<br>
someone ?) and I'd like to know if it's worth fighting with mod_wsgi on<br>
win32 or not.<br>
<br>
TIA,<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
Yves Moisan<br>
</font><div><div></div><div><br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Tilecache mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Tilecache@openlayers.org" target="_blank">Tilecache@openlayers.org</a><br>
<a href="http://openlayers.org/mailman/listinfo/tilecache" target="_blank">http://openlayers.org/mailman/listinfo/tilecache</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>