I'm afraid of mailing you again, but i really need to know something more about that.<br>I've done some research on my own, just tell me if i've interpreted well what you've said.<br><br>For my issue, i can keep using Tilecache. I just have to use a tiled TIFF image (that i can make with gdal_translate) and use a GDAL layer instead of the existing ImageLayer.<br>
No performance problems will arise.<br><br>Is that what you mean?<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 4:14 PM, Christopher Schmidt <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:crschmidt@metacarta.com">crschmidt@metacarta.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><div class="im">On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 04:03:19PM +0200, Enrico Sartorello wrote:<br>
> First of all, thanks for your answer.<br>
> But, what if i make and usa a unique huge image? Will the performances<br>
> suffer or what?<br>
<br>
</div>If you use the GDAL layer (instead of the image layer), and you use a<br>
tiled image -- like a tiled TIFF -- as opposed to a compressed image,<br>
like a jpeg, you should be fine.<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
<font color="#888888">--<br>
Christopher Schmidt<br>
MetaCarta<br>
</font></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Enrico Sartorello<br>