Thanks for the concise explanation Oliver!<div><br></div><div>Regards<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2011/6/7 Oliver Tonnhofer <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:olt@omniscale.de">olt@omniscale.de</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
Hi Fernando,<br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
On 07.06.2011, at 16:19, Fernando Ribeiro wrote:<br>
> I am currently analyzing some proxy cache solutions, namely TileCache, and recently came across with a nice benchmark document by Terrestris, presented @ FOSS4G2010.<br>
> On that document it is said that TileCache can only generate MetaTiles/MetaBuffers in JPEG/GIF formats...or maybe I miss understood this point. I cannot find anything stating this bottleneck!<br>
><br>
> Can someone provide some explanation on this issue?<br>
<br>
</div></div>That got clarified during the presentation. TileCache supports meta tiles for PNG if you do not use interlaced PNGs. For Mapserver see <a href="http://mapserver.org/faq.html#why-doesn-t-pil-python-imaging-library-open-my-pngs" target="_blank">http://mapserver.org/faq.html#why-doesn-t-pil-python-imaging-library-open-my-pngs</a><br>
<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
Oliver<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
--<br>
Oliver Tonnhofer | Omniscale GmbH & Co KG | <a href="http://omniscale.de" target="_blank">http://omniscale.de</a><br>
<a href="http://mapproxy.org" target="_blank">http://mapproxy.org</a> | <a href="https://bitbucket.org/olt" target="_blank">https://bitbucket.org/olt</a> | @oltonn<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</font></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Fernando Ribeiro<br><br>
</div>