Hi Chris and Jorge,<div><br></div><div>@Jorge</div><div>I'm looking for options using only our client infrastructure.</div><div><br><div>@ Chris </div><div>That's an option, for sure. What I was looking to know is about the possibility of splitting the tiles through different disks (on different machines or not) and only having one tilecache instance. It will be achievable having several disks in the same machine each one keeping the tiles of a different zoom level?</div>
<div><br></div><div>We're evaluating options, right now.</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 2:33 PM, <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:christopher.schmidt@nokia.com">christopher.schmidt@nokia.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="im"><br>
On Jan 16, 2012, at 9:18 AM, ext Jorge Arévalo wrote:<br>
<br>
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 3:12 PM, Pedro Miguel Mendes<br>
> <<a href="mailto:p.m.g.mendes@gmail.com">p.m.g.mendes@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>> Hi,<br>
>><br>
>> Can anyone give me a scenario where one could set up multiple disks to store<br>
>> the tiles in a distributed way? All the disks are in machines in the same<br>
>> infrastructure.<br>
>><br>
><br>
</div><div class="im">> What about a distributed TMS/WMTS service? Using a Cloud infrastructure.<br>
<br>
</div>... What? How is that related to the question he's asking? :p<br>
<br>
Pedro: I don't have any suggestions on storing tiles across multiple machines.<br>
One of the things I Know people have done before is given multiple machines<br>
different DNS names, and then used deterministic round-robin (like the tile<br>
generation in OpenLayers) -- then, each server only gets some of the requests<br>
(where 'some' is the number of servers you have in the round robin).<br>
<br>
-- Chris</blockquote></div><br></div></div>