<html><head></head><body bgcolor="#FFFFFF"><div>Thanks very much,Mendes.</div><div>The idea of store tiles in zip format is saving disk space, right now we have disk space problem. Because a lot of tiles are too small,even smaller than one file cluster. If we can store tiles as one file, that would save a lot of disk space. </div><div><br></div><div>I read tilesize doc v2.1. In the doc, it says tilecache support mbtiles and amazon cloud storage.</div><div><br></div><div>Grt</div><div><br></div><div>Xiaoyu<br><br><br></div><div><br>Op 16 jan. 2012 om 14:03 heeft Pedro Mendes <<a href="mailto:p.m.g.mendes@gmail.com">p.m.g.mendes@gmail.com</a>> het volgende geschreven:<br><br></div><div></div><blockquote type="cite"><div><div class="im" style=""><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin-top:0px;margin-right:0px;margin-bottom:0px;margin-left:0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">
1. Can I store tile in zip or gz format?<br>For my understand Apache web server can read gz or zip format. <br></blockquote><div><br></div></div><div style="">The tiles must be stored in a raster format (png, jpg, gif, etc.) support by TileCache. It would not make too much sense to apply compression to image formats (take png as an example) because they are already compressed.</div>
<div class="im" style=""><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin-top:0px;margin-right:0px;margin-bottom:0px;margin-left:0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">
2. tilessize matter? 512*512 vs 256*256 which one is faster<br>256pixels took too much disk space. if we use 512 pixel, I think tiles totally size will be smaller.<br>because ,if the 256pixel tile is less than 4kb, the tile still take 4kb disk space. that s why I want to increase to 512*512px.<br>
</blockquote><div><br></div></div><div style="">You must evaluate which ones fits you best: Depending on your data complexity, but normally if the tiles are bigger the seeding process will take a longer.</div><div class="im" style="">
<div><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin-top:0px;margin-right:0px;margin-bottom:0px;margin-left:0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">
3. Is MBtiles as same faster as disk tiles, if I store tiles in mbtiles? </blockquote><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin-top:0px;margin-right:0px;margin-bottom:0px;margin-left:0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">
4. how much diskspace can MBtiles save?(if we have 500GB disk tiles right now, MBtiles will be 100GB or even smaller?)<br></blockquote><div><br></div></div><div style="">TileCache only provides two types of cache DiskCache and <span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif">MemoryCache. For MBTiles you must go seek other tile cache implementations like MapProxy.</span></div>
<div style=""><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><br></span></div><div style=""><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><br></span></div><div style=""><span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif">Regards, </span></div><div style="">
<span style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif">Mendes</span></div>
</div></blockquote></body></html>