>From my understanding to attain that set up with TileCache you must have one TileCache instance for each region you.<div><br></div><div>In my case I'm trying upgrade only the disk storage without adding and configuring more TileCache instances. Don't if that's possible, though...</div>
<div><br></div><div>Thanks for the feedback.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2012/1/16 Jorge Arévalo <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jorge.arevalo@deimos-space.com">jorge.arevalo@deimos-space.com</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Hi,<br>
<br>
Ok, I misunderstood. Sorry.<br>
<br>
I actually have a slightly different situation, with different<br>
machines, each of one storing tiles of all the desired zoom levels but<br>
from different parts of the world. All machines together form a big<br>
coverage. Trying MapProxy and TileCache. But I think it doesn't fit<br>
your problem.<br>
<br>
Sorry again.<br>
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
<br>
<br>
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Pedro Mendes <<a href="mailto:p.m.g.mendes@gmail.com">p.m.g.mendes@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> Hi Chris and Jorge,<br>
><br>
> @Jorge<br>
> I'm looking for options using only our client infrastructure.<br>
><br>
> @ Chris<br>
> That's an option, for sure. What I was looking to know is about<br>
> the possibility of splitting the tiles through different disks (on different<br>
> machines or not) and only having one tilecache instance. It will be<br>
> achievable having several disks in the same machine each one keeping the<br>
> tiles of a different zoom level?<br>
><br>
> We're evaluating options, right now.<br>
><br>
> Thanks.<br>
><br>
><br>
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 2:33 PM, <<a href="mailto:christopher.schmidt@nokia.com">christopher.schmidt@nokia.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> On Jan 16, 2012, at 9:18 AM, ext Jorge Arévalo wrote:<br>
>><br>
>> > On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 3:12 PM, Pedro Miguel Mendes<br>
>> > <<a href="mailto:p.m.g.mendes@gmail.com">p.m.g.mendes@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>> >> Hi,<br>
>> >><br>
>> >> Can anyone give me a scenario where one could set up multiple disks to<br>
>> >> store<br>
>> >> the tiles in a distributed way? All the disks are in machines in the<br>
>> >> same<br>
>> >> infrastructure.<br>
>> >><br>
>> ><br>
>> > What about a distributed TMS/WMTS service? Using a Cloud infrastructure.<br>
>><br>
>> ... What? How is that related to the question he's asking? :p<br>
>><br>
>> Pedro: I don't have any suggestions on storing tiles across multiple<br>
>> machines.<br>
>> One of the things I Know people have done before is given multiple<br>
>> machines<br>
>> different DNS names, and then used deterministic round-robin (like the<br>
>> tile<br>
>> generation in OpenLayers) -- then, each server only gets some of the<br>
>> requests<br>
>> (where 'some' is the number of servers you have in the round robin).<br>
>><br>
>> -- Chris<br>
><br>
><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</div></div><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">--<br>
Jorge Arévalo<br>
Internet & Mobility Division, DEIMOS<br>
<a href="mailto:jorge.arevalo@deimos-space.com">jorge.arevalo@deimos-space.com</a><br>
<a href="http://mobility.grupodeimos.com/" target="_blank">http://mobility.grupodeimos.com/</a><br>
<a href="http://www.libregis.org" target="_blank">http://www.libregis.org</a><br>
<a href="http://geohash.org/ezjqgrgzz0g" target="_blank">http://geohash.org/ezjqgrgzz0g</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>