<html><head></head><body bgcolor="#FFFFFF"><div>Thanks for quick reply. It would be nice that someone can update the doc. And who can answer the following question. Otherwise, I have to dig into tilecache source code ...<br><br><blockquote type="cite"><div><div class="gmail_quote"><div><font class="Apple-style-span" color="#000000">" I don't know if TileCache follows the same strategy as MapProxy regarding tiles with the same RGB (i.e. lake areas) as it reuses tiles permitting huge disk space savings."</font></div></div></div></blockquote></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Grt</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Xiaoyu</div><div><br></div><div><br>Op 17 jan. 2012 om 11:12 heeft Pedro Mendes <<a href="mailto:p.m.g.mendes@gmail.com">p.m.g.mendes@gmail.com</a>> het volgende geschreven:<br><br></div><div></div><blockquote type="cite"><div><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div bgcolor="#FFFFFF"><div>I read tilesize doc v2.1. In the doc, it says tilecache support mbtiles and amazon cloud storage.</div>
</div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>You're right. Sorry, my bad. A cache persistent in MBTiles will not scale as well as other options. Theoretically, a sqlite db could be terabyte-sized (<a href="http://www.sqlite.org/features.html">http://www.sqlite.org/features.html</a>) but keep in mind that the access to the tiles would degraded just after a few gigabytes. I don't know if TileCache follows the same strategy as MapProxy regarding tiles with the same RGB (i.e. lake areas) as it reuses tiles permitting huge disk space savings.</div>
</div>
</div></blockquote></body></html>