[Webcom] Should OSGeo-Live documentation replace pages in OSGeo
cameron.shorter at gmail.com
Wed May 18 16:28:35 EDT 2011
OSGeo Web committee,
I believe we are now at a point where we can practically copy quality
project descriptions (and their translations) from the OSGeo-Live web
pages  across to the main OSGeo web pages .
I'd like to determine whether people think this would be desirable, and
if so, we should agree on how some of the technical details.
Currently, The OSGeo project contains one page InfoSheets for each of
the graduated and incubation OSGeo projects. Eg:
OSGeo-Live contains 1 page "Project Overviews" which contains roughly
the same information. Eg:
The OSGeo-Live Overviews include all OSGeo graduated and incubation
applications (not including libraries), and also includes many other
stable Open Source geospatial applications - almost 50 of them. We do
plan to invite libraries to include descriptions in the next OSGeo-Live
The Overviews are updated with each OSGeo-Live release cycle, every 6
months. The OSGeo-Live Overviews also link to Quickstarts for each
application, and have been translated into a German, Greek, Polish, and
some Japanese and Spanish.
So my questions:
1. Should OSGeo-Live Project Overviews replace existing InfoSheets?
2. Should OSGeo web pages link to all 50 projects on OSGeo-Live, or only
OSGeo incubating/incubated projects?
3. Should the OSGeo-Live Quickstarts be referenced from OSGeo pages?
4. On a practical level, should OSGeo project links just point to
OSGeo-Live web pages (easiest), should we embed OSGeo-Live web pages
inside an iFrame (or similar) on the OSGeo web site, or should we
maintain a separate copy of OSGeo-Live docs, which are possibly modified
to remove content like a link to Quickstarts?
Tel: +61 (0)2 8570 5050
Mob: +61 (0)419 142 254
Think Globally, Fix Locally
Geospatial Solutions enhanced with Open Standards and Open Source
More information about the Webcom