<div>
<span style="font-size: 14px;">Quick logistics question, where is the presentation in the program? </span>
</div><div><span style="font-size: 14px;"><br></span></div><div><span style="font-size: 14px;">While I have managed to attend the conference, it is dependent on running the recording sessions :D As such I would really like to know what room it is so I have a chance to take part.</span></div>
<div><div><br></div><div>-- </div><div>Jody Garnett<br></div><div><br></div></div>
<p style="color: #A0A0A8;">On Wednesday, 28 August 2013 at 8:15 AM, Jachym Cepicky wrote:</p>
<blockquote type="cite" style="border-left-style:solid;border-width:1px;margin-left:0px;padding-left:10px;">
<span><div><div><div>Hi all,</div><div><br></div><div>I hope, there is already person in your WPS community, which will take</div><div>responsibility for the WPS Shootout/roundup presentation for FOSS4G,</div><div>which starts in few weeks. So far, there is only few lines from 52North</div><div>project.</div><div><br></div><div>The presentation is divided into 4 sections, every project has reserved</div><div>slide in each section, so it would be nice, if you could write something</div><div>into four slides:</div><div><br></div><div>1 - General project description</div><div>2 - What you consider special about your project</div><div>3 - What you consider problematic about your project</div><div>4 - People behind each project</div><div><br></div><div>I would also like Benjamin Proß or anybody else from the wps 2.0.0 team,</div><div>to add some infos about their work (will contact them separately).</div><div><br></div><div>Anybody has different opinion about the shootout, or different proposal</div><div>how we should do it? If not, please go ahead (or I'll shoot you)!</div><div><br></div><div><a href="https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1MJMLthdLjKwyyA3Tf2b6VmyKJdcj8SULi-HoRpKTZRA/edit#slide=id.p">https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1MJMLthdLjKwyyA3Tf2b6VmyKJdcj8SULi-HoRpKTZRA/edit#slide=id.p</a></div><div><br></div><div>Jachym - deputy sheriff</div><div><br></div><div>Dne 25.7.2013 06:11, Jody Garnett napsal(a):</div><blockquote type="cite"><div><div>On Wednesday, 24 July 2013 at 9:43 PM, Jachym Cepicky wrote:</div><blockquote type="cite"><div><div>Hi all,</div><div><br></div><div>sorry for delay, back at work (mostly, still),</div><div><br></div><div>so, what will we do? Shell we start with the wiki, where everybody</div><div>will add some features of particular project, so at the end, we</div><div>will have table of project (columns) and their features (rows), so</div><div>we can see, what's interesting where?</div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>You may want to make a shared google presentation, so people can fill</div><div>in project details & information (and collaborate on what will be</div><div>shown?)</div><blockquote type="cite"><div><div>We could also do client-server crosscheck, each client would draw </div><div>(randomly pick) some server, and then both (server and client)</div><div>could demonstrate their compatibility (of course, hard work on both</div><div>sides is assumed).</div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I think if teams could provide a download (or service) link it would</div><div>be great. Teams that provide a download earlier will get the most</div><div>testing in. That said last time we were really light on clients :(</div><div><br></div><div>I have gotten a few questions off-list asking what is going on as</div><div>they could not see WPS on the FOSS4G program.</div><div><br></div><div>Aside: You could also go for "WPS Roundup" which may be taken as let</div><div>adversarial than "shootout"</div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>-- </div><div>Jachym Cepicky</div><div>jachym.cepicky at <a href="http://gmail.com">gmail.com</a></div><div><a href="http://les-ejk.cz">http://les-ejk.cz</a></div><div>PGP: <a href="http://les-ejk.cz/pgp/JachymCepicky.pgp">http://les-ejk.cz/pgp/JachymCepicky.pgp</a></div></div></div></span>
</blockquote>
<div>
<br>
</div>