[Benchmarking] Re: MapServer and GDAL/GeoRaster driver

Smith, Michael ERDC-USACE-NH michael.smith at usace.army.mil
Tue Oct 13 13:13:24 EDT 2009


Frank,

Looks like you are doing some work on goliath. I¹m now getting much better
numbers. Not as good as tiff but much better than before. In the 1.5 second
range vs. 4.5 before. Some of that may be connection overhead and the
100mbit connection (vs gb) network speed.

---

time /var/www/cgi-bin/mapserv560beta3
QUERY_STRING="map=/opt/benchmarking/mapserver/georaster.map&bbox=80.475775,-
45.825317,90.301172,-33.192663&height=603&width=469&service=wms&request=getm
ap&version=1.1.1&srs=EPSG:4326&format=image/jpeg&layers=topo_geor&styles=&tr
ansparent=false" >test.jpg
CGI Request 1 on process 32618
msDrawRasterLayerLow(topo_geor): entering.
msResampleGDALToMap in effect: cellsize = 0.010477
msDrawGDAL(topo_geor): using RAW_WINDOW=62513 29565 2361 3035
msDrawGDAL(): red,green,blue,alpha bands = 1,2,3,0
msDrawMap(): Layer 0 (topo_geor), 1.426s
msDrawMap(): Drawing Label Cache, 0.000s
msDrawMap() total time: 1.429s
msSaveImage() total time: 0.033s
mapserv request processing time (msLoadMap not incl.): 1.463s
msFreeMap(): freeing map at 0x95234d0.
freeLayer(): freeing layer at 0x952a920.

real    0m1.540s
user    0m0.324s
sys    0m0.120s



On 10/13/09 11:46 AM, "Frank Warmerdam" <warmerdam at pobox.com> wrote:

> 
> 
> Ivan / Mike,
> 
> I have upgraded GDAL to 1.6 "svn" to incorporate the fix for oracle
> georaster overviews on the goliath server.  Let me know if performance
> of georaster overviews is still bad.
> 
> Best regards,
> --
> ---------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
> I set the clouds in motion - turn up   | Frank Warmerdam, warmerdam at pobox.com
> light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam
> and watch the world go round - Rush    | Geospatial Programmer for Rent
> 
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/benchmarking/attachments/20091013/e32938c8/attachment.html


More information about the Benchmarking mailing list