[Benchmarking] Presentation, now or never...

[Smith, Michael ERDC-CRREL-NH]

I think that¹s sounds like a good approach. The benefits of fcgi are shown
and indicates we are working on the one current problem with fcgi that will
be solved before 5.6 goes final.


On 10/15/09 7:40 AM, "Jeff McKenna" <jmckenna at gatewaygeomatics.com> wrote:

> The tests all run fine, I think there seems to be a memory leak with
> mapserver fcgi 5.6.0-betas (but all runs execute fine).  Should we just
> mention in the presentation that "the MapServer PSC is looking at this
> oracle fcgi issue"?
> 
> -jeff
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Stephen Lime wrote:
>> > Jeff: If you pull the oracle tests from the 5.6 fcgi run does it run to
>> > completion?
>> >
>> > Steve
>> >
>> > On Oct 14, 2009, at 4:38 PM, Jeff McKenna wrote:
>> >
>>> >> Frank Warmerdam wrote:
>>>> >>> Smith, Michael ERDC-CRREL-NH wrote:
>>>>> >>>> Jeff and Frank,
>>>>> >>>>
>>>>> >>>> Have we resolved the mapserv fcgi mem issue or determined its not an
>>>>> >>>> issue?
>>>> >>> Mike,
>>>> >>> I believe it is still outstanding.  I was ultimately unsuccessful in
>>>> >>> isolating
>>>> >>> or fixing it.
>>> >>
>>> >> I also think it is unresolved.
>>> >>
>>> >> -jeff
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>> >> Benchmarking mailing list
>>> >> Benchmarking at lists.osgeo.org
>>> >> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/benchmarking
>>> >>
>> >
>> >
> 
> 
> --
> Jeff McKenna
> FOSS4G Consulting and Training Services
> http://www.gatewaygeomatics.com/
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Benchmarking mailing list
> Benchmarking at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/benchmarking
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/benchmarking/attachments/20091015/48848f2e/attachment.html