[Benchmarking] SDE / PostgreSQL and versions

Schlagel, Joel D IWR Joel.D.Schlagel at usace.army.mil
Thu Sep 3 15:42:04 EDT 2009


Oy,  according to the link below no Oracle versions are supported for ArcSDE
on 9.3.1 on RHEL 5 - 32 bit.


http://wikis.esri.com/wiki/display/ag93bsr/ArcSDE+Oracle+Database+Requiremen
ts






On 9/3/09 3:24 PM, "Andrea Aime" <aaime at opengeo.org> wrote:

> Frank Warmerdam ha scritto:
>> (forwarded for Satish)
>> 
>> Frank,
>> 
>>                 Sorry I could not participate in the IRC yesterday
>> morning. It was way too early at 7 AM. Yingqi Tang participated in the
>> call from our end. I hear that the different teams plan to use ArcSDE. I
>> just wanted to let the teams know that ArcSDE 9.3.1  support for
>> PostgreSQL 8.3.0  is only available on Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS/ES
>> 4.0 Update 2 (32-bit). Please keep that this in mind for the purpose of
>> planning the operating system for the database machine. We plan to add
>> support for Red Hat Linux 5 in our 9.4 release.
>> 
>> http://wikis.esri.com/wiki/display/ag93bsr/ArcSDE+PostgreSQL+Database+Require
>> ments 
> 
> Eh, the reinstall already happened, and afaik we're using RH 5.
> Well, I guess we could all double back to SDE over Oracle then?
> Is that supported? As far as I know all products are using the SDE
> client API so in the end it does not matter what the backend
> database is.
> Pity as it would have been interesting to see what performance
> difference there is between straight PG access and access to PG
> mediated by SDE.
> 
> Cheers
> Andrea
> 


-joel

-- 
Joel D. Schlagel
US Army Engineer Institute for Water Resources
http://www.iwr.usace.army.mil




More information about the Benchmarking mailing list