[Benchmarking] split contour files are different

Michael Smith michael.smith at usace.army.mil
Mon Jul 26 11:58:46 EDT 2010


Jeff,

You could just add them as separate layers with a common layername (or group
name). 

Mike


On 7/26/10 2:49 PM, "Jeff McKenna" <jmckenna at gatewaygeomatics.com> wrote:

> Iván,
> 
> In order to display the 8 contour shapefiles efficiently in MapServer, a
> tile index file must be generated.  MapServer requires the files in a
> tile index to have the exact same attribute definitions and they must me
> in the same order.
> 
> In our full vector dataset this is not the case: contour-5, contour-6,
> contour-7 files contain different fields.  Here is a sample:
> 
> ***
> contour-4.dbf
> 
> 
> 
> ID: Real (31.15)
> ELEMENTO: Real (31.15)
> ID_SIMPLE: Real (31.15)
> MODIFICADO: Real (31.15)
> ID_HOJA: Real (31.15)
> ID_CODE: String (6.0)
> METADATO: Real (31.15)
> F_ALTA: String (10.0)
> F_BAJA: String (10.0)
> ETIQUETA: String (254.0)
> ETIQUETAS: Real (31.15)
> ETIQUETA1: String (10.0)
> SIMPLE: String (250.0)
> ETIQUETA0: Real (31.15)
> PROYECTO: String (3.0)
> LONGITUD: Real (31.15)
> PERIMETRO: Real (31.15)
> SUPERFICIE: Real (31.15)
> TIPO_0201: String (6.0)
> CATEG_0201: String (6.0)
> ORIGE_0201: String (6.0)
> COTA_0201: Real (31.15)
> NNECCCPP: String (8.0)
> ORIGEN_Z: Real (31.15)
> 
> contour-5.dbf
> 
> ID: Real (31.15)
> ID_SIMPLE: Real (31.15)
> MODIFICADO: Real (31.15)
> ID_HOJA: Real (11.0)
> ID_CODE: String (6.0)
> ID_MET: Real (31.15)
> F_ALTA: String (10.0)
> F_BAJA: String (10.0)
> ETIQUETA: String (254.0)
> ID_COD_ETI: String (10.0)
> PROYECTO: String (3.0)
> TIPO_0201: String (2.0)
> CATEG_0201: String (2.0)
> ORIGE_0201: String (2.0)
> COTA_0201: Real (31.15)
> NNECCCPP: String (8.0)
> ORIGEN_Z: Real (31.15)
> 
> 
> The contour files must be re-processed so that they contain the same
> attributes, and then provided to all benchmarking teams.
> 
> -jeff
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Benchmarking mailing list
> Benchmarking at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/benchmarking



More information about the Benchmarking mailing list