[Benchmarking] Odd results in qix index comparison

Jeff McKenna jmckenna at gatewaygeomatics.com
Thu Sep 2 05:31:48 EDT 2010


Hmm, I'll check into this right now.

-jeff



On 10-09-02 11:27 AM, Andrea Aime wrote:
> Hi,
> I was looking into the qix indexes this morning and decided
> to use shptreevis to compare the qix index built by GeoServer
> on contour-0 with the one used by MapServer on the testing server.
>
> The result left me quite surprised: it seems the MapServer one
> is missing an entire spain region?
> See the screenshot of qgis displaying the layout of the two indexes
> from GeoServer and MapServer. The mapserver one is in blue,
> the geoserver one in black.
> The same seems to be happening for other contour shapefiles
> as well.
>
> Unfortunately I had a hard time confirming whether mapserver
> draws the contour lines in that region or not using a standard
> client (qgis or udig) as the capabilities document is mis-setup
> (points back to a url containing c:/blah/blah/mapfile.map)
>
> Can someone have a look into this? Maybe it's just a problem in
> the shptreevis conversion utility having troubles with the large
> qix files (the ones I'm using for GeoServer are significantly smaller)
>
> Cheers
> Andrea
>
> PS: btw, shptreeview is a quite nice utility, thanks for sharing :-)
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Benchmarking mailing list
> Benchmarking at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/benchmarking


-- 
Jeff McKenna
MapServer Consulting and Training Services
http://www.gatewaygeomatics.com/




More information about the Benchmarking mailing list