[Benchmarking] Consensus

Andrea Aime aaime at opengeo.org
Wed Sep 8 05:09:30 EDT 2010


The slide contents look good to me. Have a look at my slides for some
charts that try to explain about the disk boundness issue:
http://svn.osgeo.org/osgeo/foss4g/benchmarking/scripts/results/2010/geoserver/geoserver.odp

Cheers
Andrea

On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 10:52 AM, Julien-Samuel Lacroix
<jlacroix at mapgears.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thank you very much for this.
>
> I'll leave others comment on that and possibly integrate it in the slides.
>
> I think this reflects the facts we discuss yesterday. If there's other
> things to say I don't know since I was not in the project enough so I'll let
> others comments.
>
> Thanks
> Julien
>
> On 10-09-08 04:23 AM, Luc Donea wrote:
>>
>> Hi Julien,
>>
>> Thanks for putting all this together.
>>
>> I think we should add slides to explain what we discussed yesterday, in
>> the common (team agnostic) part of the presentation.
>>
>> I would propose the following content, please feel free to comment/edit:
>>
>> * The initial bottleneck in the benchmark tests was the disk read access
>> * Some teams managed to turn this 'disk-bound' scenario into a
>> 'disk-unbound' scenario, allowing servers to fully run in Memory with no
>> disc access, putting all load on the CPU.
>> * Results observed in this 'disk-unbound' scenario were 5 to 10 times
>> better than in the 'disk-bound' scenario.
>> * This was possible thanks to the conjunction of the following:
>> ** the Red Hat Enterprise Linux sever is efficiently caching data blocks
>> at the OS level
>> ** the 2000 WMS requests are the exact same between all runs
>> ** the Server RAM memory is of 8GB
>> * Unfortunately, the Windows server did not behave the same way as RHEL.
>> * The Windows server was down in the last benchmark days, preventing
>> some teams to try to reproduce the disk unbound scenario.
>> * As apples cannot be compared to oranges, all participants did agree
>> that teams were not mandatory to publish their benchmark results in the
>> final presentation.
>>
>> I have put the proposal into the attached slides.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Luc
>>
>>
>> -------- Message d'origine--------
>> De: benchmarking-bounces at lists.osgeo.org de la part de Julien-Samuel
>> Lacroix
>> Date: mar. 07/09/2010 20:29
>> À: Performance testing of OSGeo and other web service engines.
>> Objet : [Benchmarking] Consensus
>>
>> Mike (or anyone really), please correct me if I'm wrong.
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> A quick reminder to every teams. You have to provide around 3 or 4
>> slides for the presentation tomorrow before noon. Please integrate them
>> in the Google Doc Presentation.
>>
>> Some idea of what you can talk about:
>> Why it was so great?
>> Difficulties?
>> Any enhancement you may have made?
>> Any tips and tricks for your users?
>>
>> You don't have to includes results in those slides. It's up to you.
>> There will be a comparison of the results in the presentation at some
>> point. Please email on the list if you don't want your results to be
>> included in the charts that will be presented (if you didn't explicitly
>> tell so during the meeting).
>>
>> Here's the slide list (not necessarily in order):
>> - History
>> - Fourth exercise
>> - First time with windows
>> - First time with something other than MapServer and GeoServer
>>
>> - Summary
>>
>> - 4 slides by Ivan describing the dataset (with the correction on the
>> GeoTiff slide)
>>
>> - Rules of engagement
>>
>> - Everyone prepare 4 slides.
>>
>> - Results
>>
>> - What's next
>> - Setup a process to discuss next year exercise
>> - Probably change the data to local data (Coloroda) next year
>> - etc
>>
>> - Clear link to the wiki that there's more info there on some exercices
>> and on team's results.
>>
>>
>> I hope that helps.
>>
>> Julien
>> --
>> Julien-Samuel Lacroix
>> Mapgears
>> http://www.mapgears.com/
>> _______________________________________________
>> Benchmarking mailing list
>> Benchmarking at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/benchmarking
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Benchmarking mailing list
>> Benchmarking at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/benchmarking
>
> --
> Julien-Samuel Lacroix
> Mapgears
> http://www.mapgears.com/
> _______________________________________________
> Benchmarking mailing list
> Benchmarking at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/benchmarking
>


More information about the Benchmarking mailing list