[Benchmarking] Seed Benchmark URLs

[Smith, Michael ERDC-CRREL-NH]

Oliver,

I've loaded up the seed requests on the Jmeter server and made a couple of
runs.

Looking at the results, it doesn't appear that the requests are sampling
the area well. The requests are either too zoomed in or too far out. We
are getting very few features per image (sometimes non at all).

I've attached a csv file of the requests as fed through Jmeter and the
resulting URLs in MapServer. I think because of the limited extent, the
zoom level values are off.

In the OpenLayers map here

http://12.189.158.78:8081/cgi-bin/mapserv6?MAP=/benchmarking/wms/2011/mapse
rver/osm-google.map&mode=browse&template=openlayers&layers=default

We want zoom levels from 4 to 9.

Mike

-- 
Michael Smith

US Army Corps
Remote Sensing GIS/Center


 

On 8/25/11 4:06 AM, "Oliver Tonnhofer" <olt at omniscale.de> wrote:

>Hi,
>
>we discussed yesterday at the IRC meeting that we make an additional
>test. The test should simulate the load during a seed of a tile cache
>server. I did a seed with MapProxy for Denver from level 8 to 17 with an
>image size of 2248x2248 (8x8 tiles plus 100px meta buffer) and recorded
>the BBOXs. Each file contains a bit more than 1000 BBOXs.
>
>http://bogosoft.com/misc/seed-3857.csv
>http://bogosoft.com/misc/seed-4326.csv
>
>
>Regards,
>Oliver
>
>-- 
>Oliver Tonnhofer    | Omniscale GmbH & Co KG    | http://omniscale.de
>http://mapproxy.org | https://bitbucket.org/olt | @oltonn
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Benchmarking mailing list
>Benchmarking at lists.osgeo.org
>http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/benchmarking

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: jmeter_results.csv
Type: text/csv
Size: 203196 bytes
Desc: jmeter_results.csv
Url : http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/benchmarking/attachments/20110828/1b862f56/jmeter_results-0001.bin