[OSGeo-Board] Infrastructure

Gary Lang gary.lang at autodesk.com
Sun Aug 13 21:08:19 PDT 2006


Have we discussed the cost yet? How does it work against the budget? The idae is to have something ready when our CN contract is up, yes? This is the first I've heard about FOSS4G. Sounds great if the money is available.


-----Original Message-----
From:	Arnulf Christl [mailto:arnulf.christl at ccgis.de]
Sent:	Sun 8/13/2006 3:12 PM
To:	"Tyler Mitchell \" <tylermitchell at shaw.ca>"@cut.autodesk.com
Cc:	board at board.osgeo.org
Subject:	RE: [OSGeo-Board] Infrastructure


On Sat, August 12, 2006 01:41, Gary Lang wrote:
> Right. I do not want to leave it until October. I haven't seen a
> schedule that says when our projects will have it to start to migrate
> to.  I do have a schedule for other things going away. So I do have a
> deadline for having an alternative. If you're saying this will be up by
> FOSS4G, that's really good news!

Tyler,
just to make sure... The OSGeo treasurer said go for it. To me that means
that we should get the Drupal prototype rolled out productive at OSUOSL
the sooner the better, start migrating right away and have it done by
FOSS4G.

If this is not correct someone please holler. Else we will need to inform
WebCom asap.

Regards,

>   _____
>
> From: Tyler Mitchell (External)
> Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 2:12 PM
> To: Gary Lang
> Cc: board at board.osgeo.org
> Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Board] Infrastructure
>
>
>
> Hi Gary and all,
>
>
>
> From my perspective, Jo and I have a good start on building the
> 'alternative' you were saying someone should just go and build.  This is
> a prototype, so far only focused on the web interface and some community
> tools.  The other needs are on our list but should really be done on
> "the" OSGeo server and not this prototype.  That is, we don't want to
> start porting SVN repositories, project mailing lists, etc. onto this
> temp. server set up we have.
>
>
>
> In my opinion, the next step is getting some cash to devote to
> sysadmin/support and server infrastructure/hardware.  This whole project
> of getting a transition plan together has landed in Jo and my's laps,
> which I'm fine with, but we are both ultimately still working off the
> side of our desks.  I hope you are still considering putting an ED in
> place, because moving these kinds of projects along could easily be
> managed by the ED so board isn't micro-managing the affair and feeling
> helpless.  I'm not sure volunteers will be able to take it all the way,
> especially on the sysadmin side where we need some guaranteed quality of
> service.
>
>
>
> I think you do not want to leave this until October.  Having as much of
> this started as possible for the FOSS4G conference is a good target, at
> least for the web/community UI side of things.  There will be increased
> momentum around OSGeo by then, and at EuroOSCON - I'd hate to still have
> a bad web site when we are promoting at those events.
>
>
>
> Tyler
>
>
>
> On 11-Aug-06, at 12:05 PM, Gary Lang wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> Board Members,
>
> Putting on my MapGuide hat here, where are we with the consideration of
> a new infrastructure for OSGeo? If it moves off of CN, we will need a
> new one. If there isn't a new one in the offing and no firm schedule for
> creating one, we'll have to build one ourselves, and by my reckoning, we
> will have to start in October.
>
> Gary
>
>
>
>


-- 
Arnulf Christl
http://www.ccgis.de


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: board-unsubscribe at board.osgeo.org
For additional commands, e-mail: board-help at board.osgeo.org



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/board/attachments/20060813/48ef2353/attachment.html>


More information about the Board mailing list