[Board] a long story starting with SOAP and ending in Switzerland
jo at frot.org
Tue Jul 10 11:51:39 PDT 2007
On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 02:34:48PM -0400, Frank Warmerdam wrote:
> o Work for JRC and other european initiatives should keep the IP held by
> consulting/contracting organizations that implement the changes.
> Presumably European companies.
But what do we mean by "keep the IP"?
Project contributors sign a CLA assigning code copyright to OSGeo.
How can one "keep" contributions to open source software?
> o If it is hard for OSGeo to speak on behalf of the european foss4g
> community because it is too American, then I think an existing
> european organization (perhaps a substantial OSGeo local chapter or
> an affiliated group like GRASS GaV.
Well, more than being about the OSGeo community in european countries,
this is about the possibility of doing work with all the global projects,
in a european context, through whatever european business entity needed.
But yes, there are local groups and chapters which could perhaps help
form a 'consortium'. But then projects without local members may not
get such strong representation.
>I think moving to Switzerland isn't
> *really* solving anything, and I don't think we can support the
> complexity involved in having formally incorporated OSGeo organizations
> as shells in many places. If we have to be somewhere, I think the USA
> with 501(c)3 status is the most appropriate unless US law (patent, etc)
> were to essentially drive us out.
But then we could have a Swiss bank account...
I wonder if we may encounter backlash towards a US-based entity for
the Foundation in the future, though. I see this as a way of
solving potential future problems. Does anyone else think this at
least worth looking into, the question of internationalising the basis?
More information about the Board