[Board] Re: [Foss4g2009] OSGeo AGM at FOSS4G?
Tyler Mitchell (OSGeo)
tmitchell at osgeo.org
Tue Feb 3 09:32:33 PST 2009
If there was unlimited time and energy we could easily have a half-
day get together event. But this is somewhat what FOSS4G already is
for OSGeo, so rather than suggest that, it might work if we could
roll AGM talks into regular presentation sessions instead. e.g. have
one presentation where sponsors talk about their goals and experience
(good for other potential sponsors to attend), and other ones talking
about projects or committees (good for users or for potential
volunteers who might like to help on a committee), etc. Roll them
together into a string to make a virtual half day session. It could
be the AGM stream. Then we also have a group session with an open
format for more discussion. I haven't looked closely at timing and
availability in the conference programme timetable, but if it's
workable I would help organise this.
I think it would be more manageable. With my "user" hat on, I'd hate
to lose the chance for individual projects/committees/sponsors and a
"real person" to share with the group. This way you'd still get to
see a face but also not be locked in to have to see all of them ;-)
Tyler
On 3-Feb-09, at 8:02 AM, Frank Warmerdam wrote:
> Daniel Morissette wrote:
>> Tyler Mitchell (OSGeo) wrote:
>>> Hi Cameron, space for a 2 hour meeting would be ideal. While it
>>> always depends on scope 1.5 hours will feel a bit too tight. Of
>>> course, I missed 2008's AGM, so others might have a different
>>> perspective. But at least for logistical purposes, I'd like to
>>> see at least 2 hours if possible.
>>>
>> I found that the timing for the 2008 AGM was not ideal. It was a
>> bit late and all the reports were rushed because everybody wanted
>> to go have a beer and some food. That didn't leave much room for
>> open discussion with the audience. I agree with allocating 2
>> hours, and would also suggest that 4-6pm on the last day may not
>> be an ideal time.
>> I just checked and in 2007 it was at the end of the first day of
>> workshops... that was a while ago, but I don't seem to remember as
>> much pressure to rush things. That could be a combination of less
>> reports/topics to discuss and being on the first day when people
>> just arrived.
>
> I will second Daniel's point about things being very rushed this year.
> I believe we need to reconsider the policy of asking all projects,
> committees
> and local chapters to give a report. It just isn't scaling up well
> as the
> number of projects and chapters grows.
>
> Best regards,
> --
> ---------------------------------------
> +--------------------------------------
> I set the clouds in motion - turn up | Frank Warmerdam,
> warmerdam at pobox.com
> light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam
> and watch the world go round - Rush | Geospatial Programmer for
> Rent
>
> _______________________________________________
> Board mailing list
> Board at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/board
Tyler Mitchell
Executive Director
Open Source Geospatial Foundation
tmitchell at osgeo.org
P: +1-250-277-1621
M: +1-250-303-1831
More information about the Board
mailing list