[Incubator] Re: [Board] Codesprint guidelines posted

[christopher.schmidt at nokia.com]

The incubation list is almost certainly not the best way :-) Each project is supposed to have a representative to the board as part of coming out of incubation, right? Have we kept that up? If not, we probably should...

"ext Seven (aka Arnulf)" <seven at arnulf.us> wrote:

Tim,
I suggest you go to the Wiki directly [1] and change what you think
needs to be changed. It is a Wiki do-ocracy and I actually sort of
expect you to propose changes directly.

Maybe we should also include the incubation list - or what is the best
way of getting a hold of all projects? Ideas?

Thanks,
Arnulf.

[1] http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Code_Sprint_Guidelines

On 09/20/2011 01:02 PM, Tim Schaub wrote:
> Thanks for putting these up Michael.
>
> I think a number of us have issues with the "bigger is better" notion
> with regard to code sprints.  I have certainly seen cases where size
> contributes diminishing returns.
>
> My preference would be to leave the last sentence off entirely (the
> num days x num projects x num participants metric), as I don't think
> it is an accurate way to measure "sprint value."
>
> Would other object if we took out this sentence?
>
> "OSGeo will provide financial support proportional to the "size" of
> the event, as measured by(the number of projects) times (the number
> attendees) times (the number of days)."
>
> If we need some sort of heuristic for determining how much OSGeo
> should contribute toward a particular sprint, I think it would come
> from answering questions like these:
>
> 1) Are there clear objectives for the projects/people involved?
> 2) Is there a demonstrated need for what participants plan to accomplish?
> 3) Are the people involved the right ones to accomplish the objectives?
>
>
> Tim
>
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 10:02 PM, Michael P. Gerlek <mpg at flaxen.com> wrote:
>> At the board meeting yesterday, I presented a set of guidelines that the
>> board should consider when being requested to provide support for a
>> codesprint.  I've captured the content here:
>>
>> http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Code_Sprint_Guidelines
>>
>> Comments welcome.  (Jeroen, your thoughts would be particularly appreciated,
>> as you're the representative of the Bolsena sprint.)
>>
>> -mpg
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Board mailing list
>> Board at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/board
>>
>
>
>


--
Exploring Space, Time and Mind
http://arnulf.us
_______________________________________________
Incubator mailing list
Incubator at lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/board/attachments/20110920/e896f677/attachment.htm>