[Board] The "impartiality" agenda item

[Jody Garnett]

There was also reference to the incubation process not accepting GeoToolkit, which I briefly replied to.

To be fair the incubation process has received several rounds of criticism, mostly as projects cannot expect any kind of timely response. It looks to be an area where our eyes are bigger then our stomach in terms of volunteer resourcing.
-- 
Jody Garnett


On Thursday, 9 August 2012 at 7:36 AM, Michael P. Gerlek wrote:

> There is an item on the agenda for tomorrow's meeting having to do with impartiality.
> 
> I looked briefly through the threads referenced and saw only one relevant post -- by Adrian Custer about Martin Desruisseaux not being a charter member and about the makeup of the board being stacked in favor of GeoServer.
> 
> With all due respect to Adrian, it's not clear to me that there are any actual substantive issues that need to be addressed. Was there other discussion about this that I missed? What's the real issue here that we're being asked to discuss tomorrow, and with what expected decision or resolution to be achieved? 
> 
> -mpg
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Board mailing list
> Board at lists.osgeo.org (mailto:Board at lists.osgeo.org)
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/board
> 
> 


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/board/attachments/20120809/4e931586/attachment.htm>