[Board] Motion: Accept all 22 Nominees of 2012 as new OSGeo Charter Members

[Michael P. Gerlek]

Sorry, I'm not quite following this -  just to be clear - is Arnulf proposing we accept all 22 names as new charter members and skip the normal election process which would be for 20 new members?

As a practical matter that seems reasonable, but I always worry about changing the rules as we go along and setting bad precedents. Have we done this before?

.mpg

On Jul 7, 2012, at 9:19 AM, Mark Lucas <mlucas17 at mac.com> wrote:

> +1
> 
> Arnulf, good call, approve all 22
> 
> Mark
> 
> On Jul 7, 2012, at 3:20 AM, "Arnulf Christl (OSGeo)" <arnulf at osgeo.org> wrote:
> 
>> Board,
>> I motion to accept all nominees listed on the nomination page on
>> 2012-07-06 [1] as new OSGeo Charter Members.
>> 
>> 
>> Please someone second this motion so that we can proceed to vote.
>> 
>> 
>> Thank you,
>> Arnulf
>> 
>> [1]
>> http://wiki.osgeo.org/index.php?title=New_Member_Nominations_2012&oldid=64378
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> The Open Source Geospatial Foundation
>> Arnulf Christl, President
>> http://www.osgeo.org
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Board mailing list
>> Board at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/board
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Board mailing list
> Board at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/board
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/board/attachments/20120707/3d2df77c/attachment.htm>