[Board] FOSS4G 2014 RFP Vote

[Mark Lucas]

Agree,

Mark


On Jul 23, 2013, at 9:38 AM, "Michael P. Gerlek" <mpg at flaxen.com> wrote:

> Do we as the board need to make a motion saying we will resolve this via voting, or can we just proceed?
> 
> * Let us please keep the NA event location and issue separate from this vote.
> 
> * I think 1-2 days to review the proposals, then a short by-email voting window.
> 
> * Normally I'd say we should have a discussion period, with a chance to debate the pros and cons of each city, but I'm not sure that is appropriate - I know I'd really like a chance to lobby for my city choice, but I'm a little uncomfortable with that although I'm not really sure why. Maybe because I see this as a tie-breaking exercise, not a chance to reopen the whole selection process?
> 
> * Given that, then, votes should go to Paul as a CRO, instead of the mailing list, to avoid early board voters influencing later voters. (The votes should not be secret, though- Paul should announce who voted for what after vote period closes.)
> 
> * In the event of a board tie vote, I suggest Jeff, as president, decides the winner.
> 
> .mpg
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Board mailing list
> Board at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/board

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/board/attachments/20130723/fe813b00/attachment.htm>