[Board] Motion: Board election procedure

[Frank Warmerdam]

Cameron,

I'm not clear why the old technique of a random tie breaker is a problem?

Best regards,
Frank



On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 2:13 AM, Cameron Shorter <cameron.shorter at gmail.com>
wrote:

>  OSGeo Board,
> I propose the Board Election Procedure be changed to the following, at:
> http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Board_Election_Procedure_2014
>
> The non-trivial change I've made is to add a tie-breaker process:
> *In case of a tied vote for board member positions, the CRO's vote will
> count as 1.5 times a normal vote, in order to resolve the tie break.*
>
> +1 for the change, Cameron
>
> If the board agrees to this change, I'll move the text across to:
> http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Board_Election_Procedure
>
> Jorge, can you please unlock this page so I can edit it too.
>
> --
> Cameron Shorter,
> Software and Data Solutions Manager
> LISAsoft
> Suite 112, Jones Bay Wharf,
> 26 - 32 Pirrama Rd, Pyrmont NSW 2009
>
> P +61 2 9009 5000,  W www.lisasoft.com,  F +61 2 9009 5099
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Board mailing list
> Board at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/board
>



-- 
---------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
I set the clouds in motion - turn up   | Frank Warmerdam,
warmerdam at pobox.com
light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam
and watch the world go round - Rush    | Geospatial Software Developer
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/board/attachments/20140707/9c1a3e24/attachment.htm>