[Board] Support for OSGeo officers (Re: My attendance in Portland)

Suchith Anand Suchith.Anand at nottingham.ac.uk
Thu Jul 17 03:37:48 PDT 2014


Arnulf,

Though the OSGeo President role is voluntary , I fully agree that there should be a funding mechanism in place for OSGeo President's travel budget for example. OSGeo President should not have to ask and argue for funds each time they travel to represent the organisation.

My suggestion, it to have the OSGeo Board to decide allocating a yearly travel budget to cover OSGeo President's travel for attending key strategic events globally. Whoever is the OSGeo President can then free thier time and efforts to concentrate on bigger things for the organisation. 

Suchith


________________________________________
From: board-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [board-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Seven (aka Arnulf) [seven at arnulf.us]
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2014 11:01 AM
To: board at lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [Board] Support for OSGeo officers (Re: My attendance      in      Portland)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Folks,
this is all good and nice but this will not work if the presidents
have to ask and argue for every 100 bucks they spend on their job. And
yes, the way that people now are apparently seeing this role - it is a
*job*. Which means it takes away time from your day-job. And nobody
can sustain this for any prolonged period. Both Jeff and I have
already proven this. So either the president will not be able to live
up to the expectations expressed here or they will burn out and run
dry. The only option is to have some funding.

This is a no-brainer. So please, if you suggest a four year term then
also specify whether this should be a full term / part time / leisure
/ hobby job and if so how you expect to fund it and then also provide
arguments for the community why this job is funded and who should pay
for it.

...comes in an erlies scenario with payed membership...

Cheers,
Arnulf


On 07/17/2014 11:35 AM, Bart van den Eijnden wrote:
> I agree. I’d say 4 years is good for both min and max (so nothing
> less than 4, but also nothing more than 4 ideally).
>
> First step is for the (Charter Member) community to re-elect Jeff
> in the upcoming board elections. Then the board can vote him into
> presidency again.
>
> Best regards, Bart
>
> On 17 Jul 2014, at 11:17, Suchith Anand
> <Suchith.Anand at nottingham.ac.uk> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> My humble suggestion is that President term should be min 4 year
>> term . This is what many other organisations do as it takes time
>> for people to learn and grow into the role.  Having yearly
>> changes is not good for the organisation.
>>
>> Jeff is doing an amazing role as President of OSGeo actively
>> promoting us globally and providing strong leadership. I
>> requested him when i met him at FOSS4G-E  , if he is happy to
>> continue as OSGeo President to please consider min. 4 year term.
>> I am happy to see he is considering this.
>>
>> Suchith
>>
>>
>> From: board-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
>> [board-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Jeff McKenna
>> [jmckenna at gatewaygeomatics.com] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2014
>> 9:59 AM To: board at lists.osgeo.org Subject: Re: [Board] Support
>> fot OSGeo officers (Re: My attendance in Portland)
>>
>> On 2014-07-16, 10:07 AM, Seven (aka Arnulf) wrote:
>>> Next: Yes, my business suffered a lot during my presidency. It
>>> is one of the reasons why I think that the term should be
>>> limited. Oher than Jeff I think that one year president elect
>>> followed by one year full president is enough. There is
>>> nothing worse than burning out your presidents and discarding
>>> them when they are done. Not good.
>>>
>>
>> Hi Arnulf,
>>
>> On your point about the length of term for OSGeo President I
>> strongly disagree, and it is becoming more clear to me as I grow
>> into the position.  I had the pleasure of spending a lot of time
>> privately recently with Georg Gartner (president ICA) and Chris
>> Rizos (president Int Assoc Geodesy) on the road (sometimes there
>> is no better way to get to know someone than to be in a foreign
>> country with them, as you know), and I asked them their own
>> opinions - both said adamantly, 4 year term.  And yes I fully
>> agree.  It takes time to figure out the role, build
>> relationships, and make an impact.
>>
>> Even here at FOSS4G-E I was twice pulled aside by (very very
>> prominent) community members and told/asked to stay on as
>> president for a term like 4 or 5 years, as a stable face and
>> representative of the community.  I agree with them, but limited
>> to 4 years.
>>
>> And for the record, Georg actually asked me to stay on that
>> length, to work with him and our organizations.
>>
>> Those who witnessed my talks here at FOSS4G-E or at AfricaGEO
>> recently also saw a different side of me - the president is
>> actually emerging (that's the best way I can say it).
>>
>> I really appreciate you explaining the demands and assumptions
>> of the position, this really helps to explain how 'awkward' it is
>> for me to have to ask for such things, to function as president.
>> Thank you.
>>
>> Your friend,
>>
>> -jeff
>>
>> PS. I am sitting outside now with Astrid in your beautiful
>> country, she says hi too :)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________ Board mailing
>> list Board at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/boardThis message and
>> any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and may
>> contain confidential information. If you have received this
>> message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately
>> delete it. Please do not use, copy or disclose the information
>> contained in this message or in any attachment.  Any views or
>> opinions expressed by the author of this email do not necessarily
>> reflect the views of the University of Nottingham.
>>
>> This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an
>> attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage
>> your computer system, you are advised to perform your own
>> checks. Email communications with the University of Nottingham
>> may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________ Board mailing
>> list Board at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/board
>
> _______________________________________________ Board mailing list
>  Board at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/board
>


- --
Seven of Nine
http://arnulf.us/Seven
Exploring Body, Space and Mind
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlPHnuIACgkQXmFKW+BJ1b0VBgCfcP5VKhwnRs+ZtMmqczG6G5zh
/tkAn1P/MZ/Sy1hg02uJvCW6El0qPKuq
=z9qF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Board mailing list
Board at lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/boardThis message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it.   Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this message or in any attachment.  Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham.

This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an attachment
may still contain software viruses which could damage your computer system, you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation.







More information about the Board mailing list