[Board] motions from June 18 meeting - making OSGeo Charter membership more exclusive

[Peter Baumann]

just to speak it out: of course NOs are one way of upvoting a favourite candidate.
-Peter


On 06/22/15 19:02, Jorge Sanz wrote:
> 2015-06-22 18:09 GMT+02:00 Daniel Morissette <dmorissette at mapgears.com>:
>> Margherita makes a very good point here, that if someone gets multiple NO
>> votes then they are probably not a good candidate. That's what I would have
>> thought as well.
>>
>> However, after last year's election I was extremely surprised to see that
>> even the top-5 candidates which all got over 70% support also got 2-3 NO
>> votes each:
>>
>> http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Election_2014_detailed_results
>>
>> I don't understand why someone would vote NO for those 5 people as charter
>> members given track record. I can only imagine that not everybody interprets
>> the "NO" vote to mean the same thing...
>>
> I'm pretty sure of that Daniel, and we only can try to improve that
> being well explicit on the instructions but still many people don't
> read the explanations.
>
> I remember watching someone votes (no name, just his/her votes) and I
> was surprised of seeing a lot of NOes and thinking "he has not
> understood what we wanted to mean by a YES/NO/Abstain".
>
> We'll try this year to improve the instructions on the voting, definitely.
>
>

-- 
Dr. Peter Baumann
 - Professor of Computer Science, Jacobs University Bremen
   www.faculty.jacobs-university.de/pbaumann
   mail: p.baumann at jacobs-university.de
   tel: +49-421-200-3178, fax: +49-421-200-493178
 - Executive Director, rasdaman GmbH Bremen (HRB 26793)
   www.rasdaman.com, mail: baumann at rasdaman.com
   tel: 0800-rasdaman, fax: 0800-rasdafax, mobile: +49-173-5837882
"Si forte in alienas manus oberraverit hec peregrina epistola incertis ventis dimissa, sed Deo commendata, precamur ut ei reddatur cui soli destinata, nec preripiat quisquam non sibi parata." (mail disclaimer, AD 1083)