[Board] acknowledging both sponsors vs participants

[Jody Garnett]

Thanks for the archive link, does not quite capture the level of project
commitment I was trying to capture. There is a vast difference between a
contributor and committer. There is an equally vast difference between a
committer and a maintainer (who has made an ongoing time commitment).

For recognizing organizations we are focused o those who are providing an
ongoing commitment. Perhaps it would be best not to have levels for this
one and just list organizations who have made such a statement.

If anyone has other ideas here it would be great, we are trying to figure
out a way to acknowledge participating organizations based on time (rather
than just sponsorship which relies on money - and can be an unjust
measurement around the world ).
On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 7:00 AM Markus Neteler <neteler at osgeo.org> wrote:

> On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 9:59 AM, Cameron Shorter
> <cameron.shorter at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi Jody,
> > Yes, I've raised a ticket with the OSGeo SAC to look into it.
> > Seems the page is too big,
>
> I guess a PHP setting is still wrong:
>
> here the log:
> [Sat Nov 21 06:59:09 2015] [error] [client 151.62.103.164] PHP Fatal
> error:  Allowed memory size of 67108864 bytes exhausted (tried to
> allocate 908677 bytes) in
> /var/www/wiki_osgeo/includes/parser/Parser.php on line 1291
>
> We'll fix it via SAC list.
>
> Best
> Markus
>
> --
> http://consulting.neteler.org
> http://gis.cri.fmach.it/neteler/
> http://courses.neteler.org/blog
>
-- 
--
Jody Garnett
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/board/attachments/20151121/70f17afc/attachment.htm>