[Board] minutes and motions for 2015-09-19 (Seoul)
Anne Ghisla
a.ghisla at gmail.com
Mon Sep 21 00:56:19 PDT 2015
On Sat, 19 Sep 2015 16:19:57 +0200
Massimiliano Cannata <massimiliano.cannata at supsi.ch> wrote:
> Hello,
> here are the meeting minutes and motions from
> http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Board_Meeting_2015-09-19
>
> Board member please reply to this mail with your vote for the motions.
Hi all,
here are my votes:
> *Motions:*
>
> 1. Approve past meeting's minutes
+1
> 2. Create a new official Paypal account for OSGeo (and transfer the
> money from the old account)
+1
> 3. OSGeo contact Web page: remove the form from the page and
> include the list of e-mails (board address, president, tresurer,
> discussion list, project mailing lists, etc..)
+1, good idea! I find such information more useful than the form.
> 4. Use Google infrastructure for mails and drive space
+0
I share Gérald's concerns, but also know that internal mail/files
management is a significant task for SAC. Either we go for Google mails
and drive (or any other external service) either SAC deserves to get
funds for it.
> *Other items:*
>
> - Approved last minute
> - Tresurer report: ~57k USD seed money transferred, extension for
> tax filling
> - Paypal account, need make a new account and transfer money from
> old to new
> - Rasdaman: on OpenHub errouneously it is owned by osgeo, request
> to change it immediately. Jeff corrected it and apologize for the
> error.
To be honest, I have been surprised by the tone of emails. Anyway, it's
solved now.
> - New board members require information to quickly get involved and
> active
> - Election, charter members shall vote to continue with
> membership, we should cope with this
Agreed.
> - Next week more details on results of election
> - Membership process
>
>
> *Actions*
>
> - Mike create Paypal account
> - Jeff ask Tyler for access details
> - Jeff talk to CoC to acknowledge that the board think that also
> ethic misconducts is topic for CoC committee
> - Vasile: Send info to new board members based on
> http://arnulf.us/sevendipity/archives/49-OSGeo-Director-Retrospective.html
> - New board: examine the election process and consider to adopt a
> nomination + second letters from other members and no veto to be
> **selected**, then if veto board could take a decision
I agree that it could be too daunty to be the first task for the new
Board; but I am confident that with so many great candidates, it will
be possible to tackle it soon.
Best regards,
Anne
--
http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/User:Aghisla
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/board/attachments/20150921/253e38f4/attachment.sig>
More information about the Board
mailing list