[Board] Fwd: minutes and motions for 2015-09-19 (Seoul)

[Jachym Cepicky]

Alex,

thank you for stepping in - I'm about to submit the ticket with some
clarification and reasoning e-mail to the SAC.

hope, you hear from me soon

Jachym

pá 25. 9. 2015 v 18:15 odesílatel Alex Mandel <tech_dev at wildintellect.com>
napsal:

> My own personal opinion (not official SAC view, we haven't discussed).
>
> Yes, outsource real email boxes if that's what members need. Please
> consider many options, there are plenty of providers besides Google.
>
> From a technical side, we just need to make sure the solution doesn't
> interfere with the current services (email lists and aliases). I assume
> whatever outsourced system would take over aliases too, but have 0
> impact on the lists.
>
> If you want SAC to research options, and how to handle the MX records
> adjustments, please file a ticket on trac.osgeo.org/osgeo
>
> Thanks,
> Alex
>
> On 09/19/2015 11:29 PM, michael.smith.erdc at gmail.com wrote:
> > Having SAC provide email/shared drive services is an additional burden.
> All things being equal, I do prefer, like Gerald, to have OSGeo stuff on
> OSGeo servers. But Google can provide mail services so much simpler, and
> probably more cost effective. So I think we should explore Google
> drive/email for OSGeo and then make an informed decision.
> >
> > Michael Smith
> > Remote Sensing/GIS Center
> > US Army Corps of Engineers
> >
> >> On Sep 20, 2015, at 2:20 PM, Fenoy Gerald <gerald.fenoy at geolabs.fr>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello everyone,
> >> I personally think that we should handle the mail server on our own to
> make it able to handle the mail boxes for our users.
> >>
> >> I’ve heard that some members want to have a real osgeo.org mailbox.
> >>
> >> So I would like to propose that OSGeo handle the mail server.
> >>
> >> Anyway, to answer your question Maxi, yes I abstain as I think it may
> be far better if we handle the mail server.
> >>
> >> Best regards,
> >>
> >>> Le 20 sept. 2015 à 12:25, Massimiliano Cannata <
> massimiliano.cannata at supsi.ch> a écrit :
> >>>
> >>> Do we consider this an "abstain" or something else? See that only mail
> and drive are proposwd to move.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Gérald Fenoy
> >> http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/User:Djay
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Board mailing list
> >> Board at lists.osgeo.org
> >> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/board
> > _______________________________________________
> > Board mailing list
> > Board at lists.osgeo.org
> > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/board
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Board mailing list
> Board at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/board
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/board/attachments/20150925/4cad4548/attachment.htm>