[Board] discussion on osgeo projects, osgeo community and incubation

[Helena Mitasova]

> On Aug 1, 2017, at 10:27 AM, Venkatesh Raghavan <venka.osgeo at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Comments below;
> 
> On 8/1/2017 11:17 PM, Jody Garnett wrote:
>> I am staring a new thread so the marketing committee can focus on the
>> printing deadline for boston.
>> 
>> Projects are starting to update to the new branding which is great - we
>> have two branding available:
>> 
>> - https://github.com/OSGeo/osgeo/tree/master/incubation/project
>> - https://github.com/OSGeo/osgeo/tree/master/incubation/community
>> 
>> Projects that are part of our incubation process fall under community
>> projects,

who and when made a decision about this? 

>> they have met our standards for being open source, spatial and
>> participatory and are being promoted as part of our foundation along side
>> their fellow community projects pgrouting and geowebcache.
>> .
>> For reference the prior branding is here
>> https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/OSGeo_Community_Projects#Comparison_with_Incubation
> 
> I propose the continued use of the same branding shown in the URL
> above with projects categorized as "OSGeo Project", "OSGeo Incubation Project" and "OSGeo Community Project”.

this is exactly what I asked for at the meeting at GetInteractive
> 
> Any change from previous categorization would require the approval
> of the board. I do not recall when such a change was decided and
> how it was approved.

I totally agree - see my note above,

Helena

> 
> Best
> 
> Venka
> 
>> 
>> The larger story is the focus not on our foundation, but on the software
>> projects and outreach.
>> 
>> * As such the incubation process is no longer called out on our website (or
>> in our branding) because it does not have any significance to website
>> visitors. Incubation is an internal process of our software foundation - it
>> does not earn its keep introducing a "third branding" if we cannot explain
>> succinctly what it actually means for potential users of the software.
>> 
>> * The board introduced the idea of community projects in response to a call
>> to be more inclusive and allow innovation
>> 
>> * Including more projects in our community does not detract from the
>> projects that were already in our community. We are doing more for software
>> projects at OSGeo to help everyone.
>> 
>> We have been avoiding a difficult conversation on osgeo project quality on
>> and off since January. At our most recent F2F meeting we took some action
>> items to hear a report from Maxi and Jeff McKenna (in Boston? details still
>> be arranged). The question of what we have to offer community projects and
>> osgeo projects, and what we expect in return, should be considered in one
>> go to be fair to everyone.
>> --
>> Jody Garnett
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Board mailing list
>> Board at lists.osgeo.org
>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/board
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Board mailing list
> Board at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/board

Helena Mitasova
Professor at the Department of Marine, 
Earth, and Atmospheric Sciences
and Center for Geospatial Analytics
North Carolina State University
Raleigh, NC 27695-8208
hmitaso at ncsu.edu
http://geospatial.ncsu.edu/osgeorel/publications.html <http://geospatial.ncsu.edu/osgeorel/publications.html>

"All electronic mail messages in connection with State business which are sent to or received by this account are subject to the NC Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.” 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/board/attachments/20170801/e27861f8/attachment.htm>