[Board] [Geo4All] GeoForAll Budget 2018

Fri Nov 24 00:11:49 PST 2017

Thanks Marc, Jody. I understand. Please send the cost estimate and I will share with GeoForAll list and and send it to the Board. I am ccing Peter Mooney who is GeoForAll main contact for website migration.

The workflow is the main priority. We need to have the form for new labs  and info added to the website, updated in the map etc . 

Best wishes,

Suchith

________________________________________
From: Jody Garnett <jody.garnett at gmail.com>
Sent: 23 November 2017 8:54 AM
To: Marc Vloemans
Cc: Suchith Anand; board at lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [Board] [Geo4All] GeoForAll Budget 2018

They key gap is getting the requirements in place, and identifying a contact point from GroForAll to see it through. Although we did our best with requirements and wire frames the majority of additional ideas happened the moment the beta website was visible.

My off the cuff idea would be to plan for 5k and expect not to use all of it. I only say this as 50% of the “wouldn’t it be nice” ideas have come from the GeoForAll community. And I agree workflow seemed to be the priority; although you may want to just try editing (to see if it would work for you) before spending any money.

On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 7:35 PM Marc Vloemans <marcvloemans1 at gmail.com<mailto:marcvloemans1 at gmail.com>> wrote:
Dear Suchith,

We can certainly ask for a pricing of the work.

However, as it concerns Geo4All I strongly suggest that we give you an estimate and you submit this to the Board. Just to follow proper procedure as this is not a Marketing Committee budget item.

Kind regards,
Marc Vloemans

> Op 23 nov. 2017 om 09:11 heeft Suchith Anand <Suchith.Anand at nottingham.ac.uk<mailto:Suchith.Anand at nottingham.ac.uk>> het volgende geschreven:
>
> Hi Jody,
>
> Yes, with the website migration now in place it is important that the forms/workflow is implemented at the same time but I understand this is too much to ask for the SAC volunteers time. If we delay this, it will only make things more complicated later, so I agree that we do this now using additional efforts.
>
> I do not have expertise in this so may I please request if you could  provide the cost estimate for this and submit this on behalf of GeoForAll to the Board. Thanks.
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Suchith
>
>
> ________________________________________
> From: Jody Garnett <jody.garnett at gmail.com<mailto:jody.garnett at gmail.com>>
> Sent: 22 November 2017 11:12 PM
> To: Helena Mitasova
> Cc: Suchith Anand; board at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:board at lists.osgeo.org>
> Subject: Re: [Board] [Geo4All] GeoForAll Budget 2018
>
> Given the large number of website ideas and requirements that came from the GeoForAll mailing list ... GeoForAll may wish to aside some budget for improvements and forms/workflow.
> On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 9:16 AM Helena Mitasova <hmitaso at ncsu.edu<mailto:hmitaso at ncsu.edu><mailto:hmitaso at ncsu.edu<mailto:hmitaso at ncsu.edu>>> wrote:
> Suchith,
>
> thanks for the official request - I have added it to the draft OSGeo budget proposal
>
> https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/OSGeo_Budget_2018
>
> Helena
>
>
> On Nov 22, 2017, at 8:43 AM, Suchith Anand <Suchith.Anand at nottingham.ac.uk<mailto:Suchith.Anand at nottingham.ac.uk><mailto:Suchith.Anand at nottingham.ac.uk<mailto:Suchith.Anand at nottingham.ac.uk>>> wrote:
>
> Dear Board,
>
> On behalf of GeoForAll, I wish to submit the budget for 2018 for your consideration.
>
> GeoForAll’s focus is on education and we have been working to enable geoeducation opportunities for all. Esp. in developing countries we now are seeing real progress being made. We see students not just as future of OSGeo but current leaders of OSGeo.
>
> FOSS4G conferences have been a great vehicle to reach out to all communities and we have been using this to provide more participation for students to present their ideas to the world. Students are also contributing hugely to the various OSGeo software projects. We have been discussing many ideas on how we can enable more participation of students and also provide recognition to their contributions. The Student Awards at FOSS4G conferences are the right instrument to enable this.
>
> Based on this, I am proposing the following for GeoForAll budget 2018
>
> GeoForAll Student awards for FOSS4G events will be 500 USD per event (both local and global). Distributed as follows
> First prize -250 USD ;Second prize - 150 USD; Third prize -100 USD
>
> We will arrange for max. 4 FOSS4G events to be supported for student awards per year (these will be FOSS4G regional events or other events like gvSIG conference etc which have a dedicated Open source Geo Track and LOC willing to run the award event. This will help us provide more global distribution for supporting student excellence.
>
> The main deliverable for any LOC wishing to take up this is to ensure there is an LOC contact responsible for running the student awards  with criteria setup etc and award ceremony done at the closing ceremony and awards given to winners.
>
> Total budget  - 2000 USD
>
> As 2018 FOSS4G Global event is happening in Africa, it is a great opportunity for widening participation for more students in Africa, so I am also requesting OSGeo Board to consider some of the ideas generated in the discussions for enabling more student participation  [1]  and plan appropriately. There is no need to rush into any decision, but I request that there is discussions take place.
>
> We had some online discussion on ideas for this [1]  and  Mark Iliffe (Chair of FOSS4G 2018) has  volunteered to administer (on behalf of LOC Dar)  directly the $2k from the OSGeo board for this . We need to be careful not to do anything that undermines the Travel Grant program structures that are already  in place . I will hope that Mark and LOC will send a detailed plan for this later on their ideas and then Board can decide as appropriate.
>
> I believe having FOSS4G in Africa in 2018, is a great opportunity esp. for the students in local universities there to ever get the opportunity to be at a  Global FOSS4G event and learn new ideas to help them develop.  This $2k can be used to support providing free registration  to eligible students in local universities will help them attend and help maximum impact for more students.
>
> I thank everyone for your inputs and I now leave this to the community and Board to discuss and take forward as appropriate.
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Suchith
>
> [1] http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geoforall/2017-November/004310.html
>
>
>
> This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee
> and may contain confidential information. If you have received this
> message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it.
>
> Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this
> message or in any attachment.  Any views or opinions expressed by the
> author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the
> University of Nottingham.
>
> This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an
> attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage your
> computer system, you are advised to perform your own checks. Email
> communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as
> permitted by UK legislation.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> GeoForAll mailing list
> GeoForAll at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:GeoForAll at lists.osgeo.org><mailto:GeoForAll at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:GeoForAll at lists.osgeo.org>>
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geoforall
>
> Helena Mitasova
> Professor at the Department of Marine,
> Earth, and Atmospheric Sciences
> and Center for Geospatial Analytics
> North Carolina State University
> Raleigh, NC 27695-8208
> hmitaso at ncsu.edu<mailto:hmitaso at ncsu.edu><mailto:hmitaso at ncsu.edu<mailto:hmitaso at ncsu.edu>>
> http://geospatial.ncsu.edu/osgeorel/publications.html
>
> "All electronic mail messages in connection with State business which are sent to or received by this account are subject to the NC Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.”
>
> _______________________________________________
> Board mailing list
> Board at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:Board at lists.osgeo.org><mailto:Board at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:Board at lists.osgeo.org>>
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/board
> --
> --
> Jody Garnett
>
>
>
> This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee
> and may contain confidential information. If you have received this
> message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it.
>
> Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this
> message or in any attachment.  Any views or opinions expressed by the
> author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the
> University of Nottingham.
>
> This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an
> attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage your
> computer system, you are advised to perform your own checks. Email
> communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as
> permitted by UK legislation.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Board mailing list
> Board at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:Board at lists.osgeo.org>
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/board
--
--
Jody Garnett

This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee
and may contain confidential information. If you have received this
message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it. 

Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this
message or in any attachment.  Any views or opinions expressed by the
author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the
University of Nottingham.

This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an
attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage your
computer system, you are advised to perform your own checks. Email
communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as
permitted by UK legislation.