[Board] About 2018 Board Election results

[Gérald Fenoy]

Dear Cameron,
thanks for your answer, it always nice to hear from wise people like you.

Nevertheless, in such a case I don’t think the timing is an issue, when you realize that something is going wrong you should react consequently. 

Anyway, I don’t have much to say till my concern has been taken into account and my recommendations are carefully considered.

If my recommendation are not acceptable, I would like to know from the board what is wrong with my suggestions.

All the best, 

Gérald Fenoy
http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/User:Djay

> Le 8 déc. 2018 à 12:27, Cameron Shorter <cameron.shorter at gmail.com> a écrit :
> 
> Hi Gerald,
> 
> I'm confident many, if not all of the unsuccessful nominees will continue to be a positive influence within the OSGeo community. Leaders need not hold official titles such as board membership in order to lead within a do-ochracy. Lets not stir up devisive debates which result is community members silently dropping off our email lists. I'm hopeful that you might consider retracting your statement. If not, I'm hopeful that the OSGeo board will decide that acting according to community opinion is more important than invoking a legal loophole.
> 
> While I accept that you have a valid concern about the breaking of process, I feel that if you wished to raise your concern you should have done so at the time the CROs announced the changes. Not now. The CROs were open in their decision to change the process, and they provided valid reasons for changing the process which I trust was based on their best assessment of the situation. Our community has voted and selected the candidates they want.
> 
> Regards, Cameron
> 
> On 8/12/18 4:01 pm, Gérald Fenoy wrote:
>> Dear OSGeo Board of Directors,
>> I would like to express my afraid about the validity of the recent board election and also make suggestion to ensure that democratic (aspect) sanctity of the election process is maintained.
>> 
>> 1) Did the board authorize the decision to extend the nomination period? Even if this was authorized, I think it is highly improper to extend nomination deadline once the nomination process has already started.
>> 
>> 2) Was the decision to extend nomination period only made by the CRO's? If that was the case, this is also grossly improper since CROs are only mandated to conduct the voting process and not change the rules of the election especially after the election process started. At least this is my understanding.
>> 
>> Considering the two points raised above, I strongly suggest that the people nominated after the initial deadline should not be counted. Their votes should be divided among the four candidates who were nominated before the initial nomination deadline and the new board members should be declared from among the four nominees. The other option is to cancel the board election and start the voting process again including only the people that were nominated in time.
>> 
>> 
>> Gérald Fenoy
>> http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/User:Djay
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Board mailing list
>> Board at lists.osgeo.org
>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/board
> 
> -- 
> Cameron Shorter
> Technology Demystifier
> Open Technologies and Geospatial Consultant
> 
> M +61 (0) 419 142 254
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Board mailing list
> Board at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/board