[Board] quick project status check and response to budget inquiry

[Bob Basques]

i've also been working on a response for geomoose.  sort of it a fractured
state at the moment though.  do you have a timeline on when something
should be submitted?

On Sat, Jan 19, 2019, 4:31 PM Jody Garnett <jody.garnett at gmail.com wrote:

> Going to share this here as one of our responsibility is to check-in with
> projects.
>
> Here are notes from todo activity
> <https://git.osgeo.org/gitea/osgeo/todo/issues/29> contacting projects
>
>
>    - deegree: active codebase, no response
>    - FDO: active codebase, PSC inactive (consider as *community project?*)
>    - GDAL/OGR: *responded*
>    - geomajas: last activity august 2018
>    - GeoMOOSE: very active, no response
>    - GeoNetwork: very active, no response
>    - GeoNode: active, no response
>    - GEOS: active, no response
>    - GeoServer: *responded*
>    - GeoTools: *responded*
>    - GRASS: activer, no response
>    - gvSIG: actually responded with a budget!
>    - Mapbender: active codebase, no response
>    - MapFish: website and latest release from 2011, consider as *community
>    project?*)
>    - MapGuide Open Source: PSC inactive, consider as *community project?*
>    - MapServer: active codebase, no response
>    - Marble: active codebase, no response
>    - OpenLayers: active codebase, no response
>    - OSSIM: active codebase, no budget response
>    - PostGIS: activer codebase, no response
>    - pycsw: active codebase, no response
>    - QGIS: *responded*
>    - OSGeoLive: last commit in September, discussion on mailing list but
>    no response yet
>
>
> Unless anyone has any objects I would like to discuss treating FDO,
> MapFish, MapGuide Open Source as community projects for the 2019 budget.
> This allows the us to fund projects like MapGuide Open Source while
> acknowledging that they no meet as a committee. Should any of these
> projects step up in activity it should be easy for them to go through
> incubation as their procedures are already in place.
>
> We may also wish to speak with the QGIS PSC about QGIS Server being listed
> as a community project. This would allow us a way to thread the needle
> between QGIS being graduated and the QGIS team adding and additional
> project which is not yet part of OSGeo.
> --
> Jody Garnett
> _______________________________________________
> Board mailing list
> Board at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/board
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/board/attachments/20190119/5963ac6b/attachment.htm>