[Board] quick project status check and response to budget inquiry

[Angelos Tzotsos]

We also need to keep in mind that most of the projects have reported to 
the board recently (see https://git.osgeo.org/gitea/osgeo/todo/issues/11 
) so we should consider those active and assign a default budget for 2019...

Cheers,
Angelos

On 1/20/19 12:31 AM, Jody Garnett wrote:
> Going to share this here as one of our responsibility is to check-in with
> projects.
>
> Here are notes from todo activity
> <https://git.osgeo.org/gitea/osgeo/todo/issues/29> contacting projects
>
>
>     - deegree: active codebase, no response
>     - FDO: active codebase, PSC inactive (consider as *community project?*)
>     - GDAL/OGR: *responded*
>     - geomajas: last activity august 2018
>     - GeoMOOSE: very active, no response
>     - GeoNetwork: very active, no response
>     - GeoNode: active, no response
>     - GEOS: active, no response
>     - GeoServer: *responded*
>     - GeoTools: *responded*
>     - GRASS: activer, no response
>     - gvSIG: actually responded with a budget!
>     - Mapbender: active codebase, no response
>     - MapFish: website and latest release from 2011, consider as *community
>     project?*)
>     - MapGuide Open Source: PSC inactive, consider as *community project?*
>     - MapServer: active codebase, no response
>     - Marble: active codebase, no response
>     - OpenLayers: active codebase, no response
>     - OSSIM: active codebase, no budget response
>     - PostGIS: activer codebase, no response
>     - pycsw: active codebase, no response
>     - QGIS: *responded*
>     - OSGeoLive: last commit in September, discussion on mailing list but no
>     response yet
>
>
> Unless anyone has any objects I would like to discuss treating FDO,
> MapFish, MapGuide Open Source as community projects for the 2019 budget.
> This allows the us to fund projects like MapGuide Open Source while
> acknowledging that they no meet as a committee. Should any of these
> projects step up in activity it should be easy for them to go through
> incubation as their procedures are already in place.
>
> We may also wish to speak with the QGIS PSC about QGIS Server being listed
> as a community project. This would allow us a way to thread the needle
> between QGIS being graduated and the QGIS team adding and additional
> project which is not yet part of OSGeo.
> --
> Jody Garnett
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Board mailing list
> Board at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/board


-- 
Angelos Tzotsos, PhD
Charter Member
Open Source Geospatial Foundation
http://users.ntua.gr/tzotsos

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/board/attachments/20190121/7b194554/attachment.htm>