<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Exchange Server">
<!-- converted from text --><style><!-- .EmailQuote { margin-left: 1pt; padding-left: 4pt; border-left: #800000 2px solid; } --></style>
</head>
<body>
<div>I love when work I offer to do is already done :-) (But dislike the android mailing client which essentially enforces top posting.) Thanks for the link, Eli!<br>
<br>
ext Eli Adam <EAdam@co.lincoln.or.us> wrote:<br>
<br>
</div>
<font size="2"><span style="font-size:10pt;">
<div class="PlainText">Official project representatives came up for the journal recently. Here is the thread,
<br>
<br>
<a href="http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/discuss/2011-June/008969.html">http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/discuss/2011-June/008969.html</a><br>
<br>
It leads to a wiki page <a href="http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Project_Steering_Committees">
http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Project_Steering_Committees</a> which appears to be updated as needed.
<br>
<br>
Eli<br>
<br>
>>> On 9/20/2011 at 3:42 PM, in message <4E7916C3.4020802@arnulf.us>, "Seven (aka<br>
Arnulf)" <seven@arnulf.us> wrote:<br>
> Chris,<br>
> how do you propose we make sure that we have an (attentive) project<br>
> representative on the board list? Ideas?<br>
> <br>
> Best regards,<br>
> Arnulf<br>
> <br>
> On 09/20/2011 04:38 PM, christopher.schmidt@nokia.com wrote:<br>
>> The incubation list is almost certainly not the best way :-) Each<br>
>> project is supposed to have a representative to the board as part of<br>
>> coming out of incubation, right? Have we kept that up? If not, we<br>
>> probably should...<br>
>> <br>
>> "ext Seven (aka Arnulf)" <seven@arnulf.us> wrote:<br>
>> <br>
>> Tim,<br>
>> I suggest you go to the Wiki directly [1] and change what you think<br>
>> needs to be changed. It is a Wiki do-ocracy and I actually sort of<br>
>> expect you to propose changes directly.<br>
>> <br>
>> Maybe we should also include the incubation list - or what is the best<br>
>> way of getting a hold of all projects? Ideas?<br>
>> <br>
>> Thanks,<br>
>> Arnulf.<br>
>> <br>
>> [1] <a href="http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Code_Sprint_Guidelines">http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Code_Sprint_Guidelines</a>
<br>
>> <br>
>> On 09/20/2011 01:02 PM, Tim Schaub wrote:<br>
>>> Thanks for putting these up Michael.<br>
>>><br>
>>> I think a number of us have issues with the "bigger is better" notion<br>
>>> with regard to code sprints. I have certainly seen cases where size<br>
>>> contributes diminishing returns.<br>
>>><br>
>>> My preference would be to leave the last sentence off entirely (the<br>
>>> num days x num projects x num participants metric), as I don't think<br>
>>> it is an accurate way to measure "sprint value."<br>
>>><br>
>>> Would other object if we took out this sentence?<br>
>>><br>
>>> "OSGeo will provide financial support proportional to the "size" of<br>
>>> the event, as measured by(the number of projects) times (the number<br>
>>> attendees) times (the number of days)."<br>
>>><br>
>>> If we need some sort of heuristic for determining how much OSGeo<br>
>>> should contribute toward a particular sprint, I think it would come<br>
>>> from answering questions like these:<br>
>>><br>
>>> 1) Are there clear objectives for the projects/people involved?<br>
>>> 2) Is there a demonstrated need for what participants plan to accomplish?<br>
>>> 3) Are the people involved the right ones to accomplish the objectives?<br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>> Tim<br>
>>><br>
>>> On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 10:02 PM, Michael P. Gerlek <mpg@flaxen.com> wrote:<br>
>>>> At the board meeting yesterday, I presented a set of guidelines that the<br>
>>>> board should consider when being requested to provide support for a<br>
>>>> codesprint. I've captured the content here:<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> <a href="http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Code_Sprint_Guidelines">http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Code_Sprint_Guidelines</a>
<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> Comments welcome. (Jeroen, your thoughts would be particularly<br>
>> appreciated,<br>
>>>> as you're the representative of the Bolsena sprint.)<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> -mpg<br>
>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>> _______________________________________________<br>
>>>> Board mailing list<br>
>>>> Board@lists.osgeo.org <br>
>>>> <a href="http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/board">http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/board</a>
<br>
>>>><br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>> <br>
>> <br>
>> -- <br>
>> Exploring Space, Time and Mind<br>
>> <a href="http://arnulf.us">http://arnulf.us</a> <br>
>> _______________________________________________<br>
>> Incubator mailing list<br>
>> Incubator@lists.osgeo.org <br>
>> <a href="http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator">http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator</a>
<br>
> <br>
<br>
</div>
</span></font>
</body>
</html>