<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
      http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">(Retitling this email thread as I don't
      believe it is relevant to the FOSS4G global decision).<br>
      <br>
      Hi David,<br>
      I think you are touching on the subtle difference between "OSGeo
      support" vs "OSGeo control" of regional FOSS4G events.<br>
      As you are hinting at, "Support" is welcome, "Control" is not. Ie,
      OSGeo should aim to collect a repository of wisdom and best
      practices, which regional conferences can draw upon, but still
      give regional conferences the flexibility to be creative and
      innovative and do things differently if they wish.<br>
      <br>
      With regards to city selection for FOSS4G-NA, I agree that it
      should be up to the region to decide the process for selecting the
      city.<br>
      <br>
      On 23/07/2013 10:36 PM, David William Bitner wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote
cite="mid:CAEqvsZsFCxU5vkyVpJ_+OD2+=W9bvZ=9jvTpu+gKkPpwU05XyQ@mail.gmail.com"
      type="cite">
      <div dir="ltr">The precedence to date has been that the regional
        events are events selected and organized by the regions at a bit
        of an arms length from OSGeo International. FOSS4G-NA in
        Minneapolis did not have the resources to operate without OSGeo
        as a financial backstop (note we just needed the "insurance"  of
        a financial backstop, not any up-front thanks to the FOSS4G-NA
        organizers in DC).
        <div>
          <br>
        </div>
        <div>If OSGeo is going to get in the business of selecting the
          locations for any of these regionals, in my opinion, OSGeo
          better be willing to step up to play a much more active role
          in these events. The direction from OSGeo to these regional
          events has been wishy-washy at best. I think that OSGeo needs
          a real strategy for these events. FOSS4G-NA is not a
          consolation prize, it is an event thrown by and for the NA
          community with a focus on the issues of that region.</div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>If the OSGeo Board and the Conf Comm believe that an LOC
          needs more experience, I think it is reasonable to encourage
          them to bid for a regional event as things are run right now.</div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>
          David</div>
      </div>
      <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
        <br>
        <div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 11:50 PM,
          Cameron Shorter <span dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
              href="mailto:cameron.shorter@gmail.com" target="_blank">cameron.shorter@gmail.com</a>></span>
          wrote:<br>
          <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
            .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
            <div text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
              <div>Hi Mark,<br>
                I do like your proposal of 1st place being awarded
                FOSS4G Global, and 2nd place being offered FOSS4G-NA the
                following year.<br>
                <br>
                However, I'm not sure who will be responsible for
                selecting the FOSS4G-NA city, or what process is in
                place (if any) for selecting a FOSS4G-NA city. If
                someone following this thread is in the know, I'd
                encourage you to speak up.
                <div>
                  <div class="h5"><br>
                    <br>
                    On 23/07/2013 12:01 PM, Mark Lucas wrote:<br>
                  </div>
                </div>
              </div>
              <div>
                <div class="h5">
                  <blockquote type="cite">
                    <div>Sounds like we are making up the rules as we go
                      along.  I think we either have a board vote or
                      not.  If someone wants to abstain because they
                      believe they have a conflict of interest that
                      should be their personal decision.</div>
                    <div><br>
                    </div>
                    <div>I'd like to find a way to select one as the
                      international conference and let the other
                      organize as a regional.  </div>
                    <div><br>
                    </div>
                    <div>I'd really like to find a way to build up OSGeo
                      revenues through some of the regional conferences
                      as well.  Perhaps as simple as when they need
                      OSGeo financial backing we work a division of
                      profits.</div>
                    <div><br>
                    </div>
                    <div>First step is simply selecting the
                      international venue.</div>
                    <div><br>
                    </div>
                    <div>Mark</div>
                    <div><br>
                    </div>
                    <br>
                    <div>
                      <div>On Jul 22, 2013, at 8:36 AM, Daniel
                        Morissette <<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                          href="mailto:dmorissette@mapgears.com"
                          target="_blank">dmorissette@mapgears.com</a>>

                        wrote:</div>
                      <br>
                      <blockquote type="cite">On 13-07-22 8:33 AM, Bart
                        van den Eijnden wrote:<br>
                        <blockquote type="cite">Right, this makes sense
                          Arnulf.<br>
                          <br>
                          My concern was merely that if there is one
                          proposal with "broad support"<br>
                          (a.k.a. conflict of interest), and all those
                          people step out of voting<br>
                          (both on the conf committee as on the board),
                          the vote will be very<br>
                          skewed. This is exactly what Daniel has
                          pointed out.<br>
                          <br>
                        </blockquote>
                        <br>
                        <br>
                        BTW, I believe Mark Lucas is on the DC LOC so
                        we'd lose him as well for the vote unless I'm
                        mistaken.<br>
                        <br>
                        <br>
                        -- <br>
                        Daniel Morissette<br>
                        <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                          href="http://www.mapgears.com/"
                          target="_blank">http://www.mapgears.com/</a><br>
                        Provider of Professional MapServer Support since
                        2000<br>
                        <br>
                        _______________________________________________<br>
                        Board mailing list<br>
                        <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                          href="mailto:Board@lists.osgeo.org"
                          target="_blank">Board@lists.osgeo.org</a><br>
                        <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                          href="http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/board"
                          target="_blank">http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/board</a><br>
                      </blockquote>
                    </div>
                    <br>
                    <br>
                    <fieldset></fieldset>
                    <br>
                    <pre>_______________________________________________
Board mailing list
<a moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:Board@lists.osgeo.org" target="_blank">Board@lists.osgeo.org</a>
<a moz-do-not-send="true" href="http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/board" target="_blank">http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/board</a>
</pre>
                  </blockquote>
                  <br>
                  <br>
                </div>
              </div>
              <pre cols="72">-- 
Cameron Shorter
Software and Data Solutions Manager
Tel: <a moz-do-not-send="true" href="tel:%2B61%20%280%292%208570%205050" value="+61285705050" target="_blank">+61 (0)2 8570 5050</a><div class="im">
Mob: <a moz-do-not-send="true" href="tel:%2B61%20%280%29419%20142%20254" value="+61419142254" target="_blank">+61 (0)419 142 254</a></div>

Think Globally, Fix Locally
Geospatial & Data Solutions enhanced with Open Standards and Open Source
<a moz-do-not-send="true" href="http://www.lisasoft.com" target="_blank">http://www.lisasoft.com</a></pre>
            </div>
            <br>
            _______________________________________________<br>
            Board mailing list<br>
            <a moz-do-not-send="true"
              href="mailto:Board@lists.osgeo.org">Board@lists.osgeo.org</a><br>
            <a moz-do-not-send="true"
              href="http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/board"
              target="_blank">http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/board</a><br>
            <br>
          </blockquote>
        </div>
        <br>
        <br clear="all">
        <div><br>
        </div>
        -- <br>
        ************************************<br>
        David William Bitner
        <div>dbSpatial LLC</div>
        <div>612-424-9932</div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    <br>
    <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">-- 
Cameron Shorter
Software and Data Solutions Manager
Tel: +61 (0)2 8570 5050
Mob: +61 (0)419 142 254

Think Globally, Fix Locally
Geospatial & Data Solutions enhanced with Open Standards and Open Source
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.lisasoft.com">http://www.lisasoft.com</a></pre>
  </body>
</html>