[COC-discuss] Classification framework

Cameron Shorter cameron.shorter at gmail.com
Fri Oct 16 15:57:37 PDT 2015


Hi all,
I've drafted a suggested amendment to our CoC to help us answer the 
question of what is/is not in scope of a CoC breach.

http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Code_Of_Conduct#Classification_Context


      Classification Context

This additional section proposed for version 2.0:

As guidance, content should align with a film classification of: 12+ or 
PG or similar. There are manycountry classifications 
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Television_content_rating_systems>. To 
remove ambiguity, we refer to theAustralian PG Classification 
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_Classification_Board#Film_and_video_game_classifications>:

  * /*Parental Guidance (PG)*/– Not recommended for viewing or playing
    by people under 15 without guidance from parents or guardians.
    Contains material that young viewers may find confusing or
    upsetting. The content is mild in impact.
      o *Violence*should be mild and infrequent, and should be presented
        in "a stylised or theatrical fashion, or in an historical context".
      o *Themes*should have a "mild sense of menace or threat" and be
        "discreet"
      o *Frightening or Intense Scenes*should be "mildly frightening"
        and have "low intensity"
      o *Crude Humor*should be "mild" or "low level"
      o *Sex, nudity and drug use*should be mild, infrequent,
        "discreetly implied" and "justified by context".
      o *Coarse language*should be mild and infrequent, and be justified
        by context.



On 16/10/2015 6:38 am, Cameron Shorter wrote:
>>
>>
>>     One thing I've been pondering since seeing the first few
>>     questions about
>>     CoC being discussed is how to "classify" what is considered a CoC
>>     breach. I'm yet to see any hard guidelines as to what is/is not
>>     acceptable. (And this sucks up large amounts of bandwidth on
>>     email lists).
>>
>>
>> You did good research on this for FOSS4G CoC so it'd be great if you 
>> could get the ball rolling here!
> Ok, I'll start looking into it.
>>
>>
>>     Looking around for what we can borrow as a standard reference, I
>>     wonder
>>     whether we can borrow from film classifications:
>>
>>     I'm familiar with the Australian classifications (being an Australian
>>     myself), which are well defined:
>>     https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_Classification_Board#Film_and_video_game_classifications
>>

-- 
Cameron Shorter,
Software and Data Solutions Manager
LISAsoft
Suite 112, Jones Bay Wharf,
26 - 32 Pirrama Rd, Pyrmont NSW 2009

P +61 2 9009 5000,  W www.lisasoft.com,  F +61 2 9009 5099

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/coc-discuss/attachments/20151017/8b571c5c/attachment.html>


More information about the COC-discuss mailing list