Steve.Lime at dnr.state.mn.us
Thu Nov 30 14:41:53 EST 2006
Folks: What is the process going to be for evaluating proposals? Given
the short timelines it seems like that some sort of a standard
assessment should be done by reviewers. Perhaps this is all ready to go
and I just missed it.
One idea might be to develop a short evaluation form for everyone to
score proposals. It might consist of a short checklist (items each
proposal must have) and then a series of areas that reviews could rank
proposals on a scale of one to five or something like that. After review
each evaluator would have a score for each proposal that could be used
rank submissions and guide discussions (one or two might float to the
top immediately). Just an idea.
More information about the Conference_dev