[OSGeo-Conf] FOSS4G 2007 - whats in a name?
Venkatesh Raghavan
raghavan at media.osaka-cu.ac.jp
Sun Oct 1 09:00:16 EDT 2006
Arnulf Christl wrote:
> Good point. Otoh this must have been discussed extensively by last years's
> organization committee resulting in the name FOSS4G. Anybody involved in
> that discussion give us advice?
The discussions are available in the private Archives at
http://grass.itc.it/mailman/listinfo/isc2006
If you want to follow the earlier discussions you need
to subscribe to that list to read the archives.
I reproduce my last reply, which
was the last-but-one thread in that
discussion.
> FOSS4G 2006 would be a good abbreviated title
>
>> I agree that it would be best to indicate in the name which communities are taking place and making this their (bi)annual event. How best to do this? Some permutations I like:
>>
>> * FOSS4G 2006 - GRASS/MUM/EOGEO User Conference
>> * FOSS4G 2006 - GRASS/MUM/EOGEO User Conferences (my favourite)
>> * FOSS4G - 2006 GRASS/MUM/EOGEO User Conference
>> * FOSS4G - 2006 GRASS/MUM/EOGEO User Conferences
>> * FOSS4G - GRASS/MUM/EOGEO User Conference 2006
>> * FOSS4G - GRASS/MUM/EOGEO User Conferences 2006
>
> Perhaps FOSS4G 2006 - GRASS/MUM/EOGEO Joint Conference
> could be considered since
>
> a) MUM already includes "User"
> b) Considering that we will be having active participation
> from developers too, it may be OK to omit the "User" part.
>
> Venka
More information about the Conference_dev
mailing list