[OSGeo-Conf] Event rotation

[Paul Ramsey]

Agreed. We should probably give not-EUR/NA another chance, then move back to NA.
P.

On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 9:49 PM, Cameron Shorter
<cameron.shorter at gmail.com> wrote:
> Jeff, I think that Tyler's question is very important.
> If Europe is selected for 2012, then I think Europe should not be selected
> for 2013.
>
> On 12/07/11 10:11, Jeff McKenna wrote:
>>
>> Hi Tyler,
>>
>> I'd prefer to wait to discuss 2013 until the committee has the 2012
>> decision (I'd like 2012 to take the priority of the committee's time now).
>>
>> -jeff
>>
>>
>>
>> On 11-07-11 6:33 PM, Tyler Mitchell wrote:
>>>
>>> Just curious if the committee has thought about what the 2013 bid target
>>> region would look like if one of the European bids are selected, or if the
>>> planned rotation will be taken into consideration this year or not.
>>>
>>> I was talking to a handful of potential Euro. (and non-Euro) bidders who
>>> were holding out for 2013 since 2012 wasn't expected to be in their region,
>>> yet they weren't ready/able as a "backup" for this round.
>>>
>>> I guess putting it the other way, if Vietnam is not chosen, will the
>>> rotation just act as if the planned region was skipped?  Probably making a
>>> mountain out of a molehill, but had to ask.
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Conference_dev mailing list
>> Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
>
>
> --
> Cameron Shorter
> Geospatial Director
> Tel: +61 (0)2 8570 5050
> Mob: +61 (0)419 142 254
>
> Think Globally, Fix Locally
> Geospatial Solutions enhanced with Open Standards and Open Source
> http://www.lisasoft.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Conference_dev mailing list
> Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
>