[OSGeo-Conf] FOSS4G rotation - proposal and vote
Dave McIlhagga
dmcilhagga at dmsolutions.ca
Mon Apr 22 06:07:42 PDT 2013
+1
Dave
On 2013-04-20, at 6:51 PM, Cameron Shorter <cameron.shorter at gmail.com> wrote:
> OSGeo Conference committee:
>
> I trust that there has been sufficient time for anyone with an opinion regarding foss4g rotation to air it, and I'd like propose a vote in order to test/confirm that we have reached a rough consensus.
>
> I propose that the international FOSS4G rotation policy be defined as per:
> http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/FOSS4G_Cookbook#City_Selection
>
> (text copied below)
> The regions FOSS4G rotates through are:
>
> Europe
> North America
> Rest of world
>
> This is caveatted by the OSGeo Conference committee feeling confident that the proposed city/region will attract the majority of the international FOSS4G audience.
>
> So our rotation policy is:
>
> Strong preference is given to the region which hasn't had FOSS4G for 2 years
> We next consider the region which had FOSS4G 2 years ago
> Only as a last resort would we consider a region which had FOSS4G last year
>
> ------------
> Could all current conference committee members please vote. Past member votes would also be welcomed.
> http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Conference_Committee#Current_Members
>
> Current Members
>
> Thierry Badard
> Lorenzo Becchi
> Peter Batty
> Gavin Fleming
> Dave McIlhagga
> Helena Mitasova
> Claude Philipona
> Venkatesh Raghavan
> Paul Ramsey
> Cameron Shorter
>
> Past Members
>
> Allan Doyle
> Olivier Ertz
> Alain Grignon
> Luc Maurer
> Daniel Rappo
> Dave Patton
> Rafael Medeiros Sperb
> Jeff McKenna
> Arnulf Christl
> Markus Neteler
> Frank Warmerdam
> Steve Lime
>
> On 13/04/13 07:24, Cameron Shorter wrote:
>> In the last board meeting, the question was raised about global FOSS4G rotation.
>>
>> we currently have a 3 way rotation policy: Europe 2013 / North America 2014 / Rest of world 2015
>>
>> It has been suggested that we should revisit this rotation policy, and consider:
>>
>> Europe / North America / Europe / North America
>>
>> Reasons:
>> * Previous global FOSS4G events have attracted more people and been more lucrative in Europe / North America
>> * Europe/North America could be argued to be less financially risky. Our one cancelled FOSS4G was in China in 2012.
>> * FOSS4G (global and regional) events traditionally draw half their attendance from the local region. Europe and North America both have large populations with established OSGeo communities.
>>
>> I'm in favour of continuing our current 3 way rotation, on the proviso that there are proven OSGeo communities outside of NA/Europe. By proven, I'd suggest that we would consider regions which have already successfully staged a FOSS4G regional event (or similar) and who can put together a compelling justification that they can attract comparable attendees and sponsors to Europe/North America.
>>
>> Looking at: http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_History
>> I see that there have previously been regional FOSS4G events in:
>> Argentina
>> India
>> Korea
>> Malaysia
>> Japan
>>
>> So for 2015, I'd suggest that our FOSS4G pre qualification should invite responses from "rest of the world" and Europe, but we should give a preference to "rest of world" assuming they can provide a compelling proposal which is likely to attract similar success to past European and North American conferences.
>>
>> Generalising the rule. Our rotation policy should be:
>>
>> * We give a strong preference to a region which hasn't had FOSS4G for 2 years
>> * We next consider the region which had FOSS4G 2 years ago
>> * Only as a last resort would we consider a region which had FOSS4G last year
>>
>> Regions are considered as: Europe / North America / Other locations
>>
>
>
> --
> Cameron Shorter
> Geospatial Solutions Manager
> Tel: +61 (0)2 8570 5050
> Mob: +61 (0)419 142 254
>
> Think Globally, Fix Locally
> Geospatial Solutions enhanced with Open Standards and Open Source
> http://www.lisasoft.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Conference_dev mailing list
> Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
More information about the Conference_dev
mailing list