[OSGeo-Conf] LOI Results

[Cameron Shorter]

David,
It seems my suggestion was not of interest to everyone, so I'll provide 
a few tips for Portland.
Note that my comments come with the usual advice of I'm just one voter 
and don't speak for everyone.

I feel that the biggest area that Portland should focus on is working on 
the depth and experience of its team of people behind it. How would you 
attract key people into your team?

One of the greatest strengths of the Nottingham bid was the proven track 
record it had of running prior regional events, and the number of 
different people of the team who all had experience running successful 
events. In particular, it included many key figures within the OSGeo 
community, which in turn has helped them understand, and attract the 
FOSS4G community, and sponsors.

On 12/06/2013 3:16 PM, David Percy wrote:
> Hello Committee,
> Should we expect any comments, or just move ahead, as we are already doing?
> :-)
> Thanks,
> Portland LOC
>
> On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 3:08 PM, David Percy <percyd at pdx.edu> wrote:
>> Cameron, Thanks!
>> As far as making the comments publicly available, we are always
>> supporting more openness and transparency in OSGEO, so that seems like
>> a reasonable idea. It should make both bids stronger!
>> Cheers,
>> Percy
>>
>> On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 1:21 PM, Cameron Shorter
>> <cameron.shorter at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I'd expect that both potential FOSS4G venues would be keen to hear feedback
>>> as to what was good or bad about their proposals from the voting committee,
>>> such that they can address this feedback in their final bid.
>>>
>>> As such, I'd like to ask questions:
>>> * Portland, Washington, would you appreciate such feedback made publicly
>>> available?
>>>
>>> * Voters, would you be comfortable publicly summarising your thoughts about
>>> why you voted for one city or another?
>>>
>>> * Voters, would it be more appropriate that one of us collate all our
>>> comments into one file, such that comments can't be linked back to one
>>> person?
>>>
>>>
>>> On 24/05/13 23:13, Paul Ramsey wrote:
>>>> Hello Portland and DC,
>>>>
>>>> The conference committee has submitted their LOI votes, and both
>>>> Portland and Washington DC met the two vote threshold to move on to
>>>> the bid stage.
>>>>
>>>> For the record, Portland received 2.5 votes and DC 3.5 (one member
>>>> split hsr vote).
>>>>
>>>> The next deadline in the process is June 30, for bid submission.
>>>>
>>>> http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/FOSS4G_2014_Bid_Process
>>>>
>>>> Thanks everyone for participating, and to the committee for reviewing:
>>>> with so many recusals, we need all your active participation in this
>>>> year's process!
>>>>
>>>> Paul
>>>> FOSS4G 2014 RFP Coordinator
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Conference_dev mailing list
>>>> Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Cameron Shorter
>>> Geospatial Solutions Manager
>>> Tel: +61 (0)2 8570 5050
>>> Mob: +61 (0)419 142 254
>>>
>>> Think Globally, Fix Locally
>>> Geospatial Solutions enhanced with Open Standards and Open Source
>>> http://www.lisasoft.com
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Conference_dev mailing list
>>> Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
>>
>>
>> --
>> David Percy ("Percy")
>> -Geospatial Data Manager
>> -Web Map Wrangler
>> -GIS Instructor
>> Portland State University
>> -gisgeek.pdx.edu
>> -geology.pdx.edu
>> -portlandpulse.org
>
>


-- 
Cameron Shorter
Geospatial Solutions Manager
Tel: +61 (0)2 8570 5050
Mob: +61 (0)419 142 254

Think Globally, Fix Locally
Geospatial Solutions enhanced with Open Standards and Open Source
http://www.lisasoft.com